ArticleGenome medicine2020
Correction to: A validated single-cell-based strategy to identify diagnostic and therapeutic targets in complex diseases.
Article in Genome medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational modeling and simulation in oncology.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Identification of kidney cell types in scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq data using machine learning algorithms.Heliyon · 2024Article
- From imaging a single cell to implementing precision medicine: an exciting new era.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.