Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32346113›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Evaluation of the effects of cell-dispensing using an inkjet-based bioprinter on cell integrity by RNA-seq analysis.

Masayuki Yumoto, Natsuko Hemmi, Naoki Sato, Yudai Kawashima, Koji Arikawa, Keigo Ide, Masahito Hosokawa, Manabu Seo, Haruko Takeyama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masayuki YumotoDepartment of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, Waseda University, 2-2 Wakamatsu-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8480, Japan.
Natsuko HemmiBiomedical Business Center, Healthcare Business Group, Ricoh Company, Ltd., 3-25-22 Tonomachi LIC 322, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 210-0821, Japan.
Naoki SatoBiomedical Business Center, Healthcare Business Group, Ricoh Company, Ltd., 3-25-22 Tonomachi LIC 322, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 210-0821, Japan.
Yudai KawashimaBiomedical Business Center, Healthcare Business Group, Ricoh Company, Ltd., 3-25-22 Tonomachi LIC 322, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 210-0821, Japan.
Koji ArikawaResearch Organization for Nano and Life Innovation, Waseda University, 513 Waseda-tsurumaki-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0041, Japan.
Keigo IdeDepartment of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, Waseda University, 2-2 Wakamatsu-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8480, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3586-6210
Masahito HosokawaInstitute for Advanced Research of Biosystem Dynamics, Waseda Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169-8555, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7070-4690
Manabu SeoBiomedical Business Center, Healthcare Business Group, Ricoh Company, Ltd., 3-25-22 Tonomachi LIC 322, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 210-0821, Japan.
Haruko TakeyamaDepartment of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, Waseda University, 2-2 Wakamatsu-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8480, Japan. haruko-takeyama@waseda.jp.
Waseda University · JPRicoh (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioprinting technology is expected to be applied in the fields of regenerative medicine and drug discovery. There are several types of bioprinters, especially inkjet-based bioprinter, which can be used not only as a printer for arranging cells but also as a precision cell-dispensing device with controlled cell numbers similar to a fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS). Precise cell dispensers are expected to be useful in the fields of drug discovery and single-cell analysis. However, there are enduring concerns about the impacts of cell dispensers on cell integrity, particularly on sensitive cells, such as stem cells. In response to the concerns stated above, we developed a stress-free and media-direct-dispensing inkjet bioprinter. In the present study, in addition to conventional viability assessments, we evaluated the gene expression using RNA-seq to investigate whether the developed bioprinter influenced cell integrity in mouse embryonic stem cells. We evaluated the developed bioprinter based on three dispensing methods: manual operation using a micropipette, FACS and the developed inkjet bioprinter. According to the results, the developed inkjet bioprinter exhibited cell-friendly dispensing performance, which was similar to the manual dispensing operation, based not only on cell viability but also on gene expression levels.

Indexed as

Cell SurvivalAnimalsBioprintingCell ProliferationCell SeparationFlow CytometryGene ExpressionMiceSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID32346113
PMCPMC7189371
OpenAlexW3019521290

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.