ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2020
Partnering With Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research.
Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Factors affecting clinical trial participation in people with interstitial lung disease: a qualitative study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Eliciting Patient Preferences for Pragmatic Critical Care Trials: A Qualitative Study.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- Article
- Experiences and preferences for learning about neonatal research: insights from parent interviews.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Article
- Parental Enrollment Decision-Making for a Neonatal Clinical Trial.The Journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
- Alternative Consent Models in Pragmatic Palliative Care Clinical Trials.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2021Review
- Promoting Disclosure and Understanding in Informed Consent: Optimizing the Impact of the Common Rule "Key Information" Requirement.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2021Article
- Informed consent: Old and new challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Health data research on sudden cardiac arrest: perspectives of survivors and their next-of-kin.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Demonstrating 'respect for persons' in clinical research: findings from qualitative interviews with diverse genomics research participants.Journal of medical ethics · 2020Article
- Bridging the Researcher-Participant Gap: A Research Agenda to Build Effective Research Relationships.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2020Article
- Consent for Acute Care Research and the Regulatory "Gray Zone".The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2020Article
- Reframing Recruitment: Evaluating Framing in Authorization for Research Contact Programs.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical trials for acute conditions such as myocardial infarction and stroke pose challenges related to informed consent due to time limitations, stress, and severe illness. Consent processes should be sensitive to the context in which trials are conducted and to needs of patients and surrogate decision-makers. This manuscript describes a collaborative effort between ethicists, researchers, patients, and surrogates to develop patient-driven, patient-centered approaches to consent for clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction and stroke.Our group identified important ways in which existing consent processes and forms for clinical trials fail to meet patients' and surrogates' needs in the acute context. We collaborated to create model forms and consent processes that are substantially shorter and, hopefully, better-matched to patients' and surrogates' needs and expectations from the perspective of content, structure, and tone. These changes, however, challenge some common conventions regarding consent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.