Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32366251›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2020

Beta-blocker efficacy across different cardiovascular indications: an umbrella review and meta-analytic assessment.

Oliver J Ziff, Monica Samra, James P Howard, Daniel I Bromage, Frank Ruschitzka, Darrel P Francis, Dipak Kotecha

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Predicting atrial fibrillation after an acute coronary syndrome: insights from the BACS & BAMI study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 2025 Thai guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2025
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Oliver J ZiffUniversity of Birmingham Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Medical School, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Monica SamraUniversity College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
James P HowardImperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Daniel I BromageUniversity College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Frank RuschitzkaUniversity Hospital Zurich, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Darrel P FrancisImperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Dipak KotechaUniversity of Birmingham Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Medical School, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. d.kotecha@bham.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBKing's College London · GBMonash University · AUUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationDepartment of Health CDF-2015-08-074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeta-blockers are widely used for many cardiovascular conditions; however, their efficacy in contemporary clinical practice remains uncertain.

methodsWe performed a prospectively designed, umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the evidence of beta-blockers in the contemporary management of coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), patients undergoing surgery or hypertension (registration: PROSPERO CRD42016038375). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception until December 2018. Outcomes were analysed as beta-blockers versus control for all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), incident HF or stroke. Two independent investigators abstracted the data, assessed the quality of the evidence and rated the certainty of evidence.

resultsWe identified 98 meta-analyses, including 284 unique RCTs and 1,617,523 patient-years of follow-up. In CAD, 12 meta-analyses (93 RCTs, 103,481 patients) showed that beta-blockers reduced mortality in analyses before routine reperfusion, but there was a lack of benefit in contemporary studies where ≥ 50% of patients received thrombolytics or intervention. Beta-blockers reduced incident MI at the expense of increased HF. In HF with reduced ejection fraction, 34 meta-analyses (66 RCTs, 35,383 patients) demonstrated a reduction in mortality and HF hospitalisation with beta-blockers in sinus rhythm, but not in atrial fibrillation. In patients undergoing surgery, 23 meta-analyses (89 RCTs, 19,211 patients) showed no effect of beta-blockers on mortality for cardiac surgery, but increased mortality in non-cardiac surgery. In non-cardiac surgery, beta-blockers reduced MI after surgery but increased the risk of stroke. In hypertension, 27 meta-analyses (36 RCTs, 260,549 patients) identified no benefit versus placebo, but beta-blockers were inferior to other agents for preventing mortality and stroke.

conclusionsBeta-blockers substantially reduce mortality in HF patients in sinus rhythm, but for other conditions, clinicians need to weigh up both benefit and potential risk.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsCardiovascular DiseasesHumansProspective StudiesAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCoronary artery diseaseHeart failureHypertensionMeta-analysisMortalityMyocardial infarctionPerioperativeStrokeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32366251
PMCPMC7199339
OpenAlexW3022464790

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.