SynthesisBMC medicine2020
Beta-blocker efficacy across different cardiovascular indications: an umbrella review and meta-analytic assessment.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Catheter Ablation on LVEF in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Pooled it
- Beta-Blocker Use in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of intravenous beta-blockers in acute atrial fibrillation and flutter is dependent on beta-1 selectivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Pooled it
- Redefining β-blocker response in heart failure patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation: a machine learning cluster analysis.Lancet (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Model-based meta-analysis of changes in circulatory system physiology in patients with chronic heart failure.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2021Pooled it
- Non-genetic risk and protective factors and biomarkers for neurological disorders: a meta-umbrella systematic review of umbrella reviews.BMC medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Consensus on the management of hypertension in individuals with diabetes by Asian-Pacific Society of hypertension (APSH) & Diabetes Asia Study Group (DASG).Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular ageing: hallmarks, signaling pathways, diseases and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Predicting atrial fibrillation after an acute coronary syndrome: insights from the BACS & BAMI study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Rate control treatment with calcium channel blockers and beta blockers for patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Impact of β-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction in patients with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2026Review
- Optimizing beta-blocker therapy in cardiovascular care: a national cross-sectional assessment of physicians' and nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Conformational Heterogeneity Underlying Divergent Signaling in Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptors.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
- β-blockers and risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events: An active-comparator restricted disproportionality on the FAERS.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- The Beta-Blocker Dilemma: Revisiting Their Role in Cardiovascular Disease.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Article
- 2025 Thai guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2025Article
- Observational
- A comparative analysis on the latest international and local guidelines for the management of hypertension.Singapore medical journal · 2025Article
- Inappropriate use of propranolol among medical students in Palestine: cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBeta-blockers are widely used for many cardiovascular conditions; however, their efficacy in contemporary clinical practice remains uncertain.
methodsWe performed a prospectively designed, umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the evidence of beta-blockers in the contemporary management of coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), patients undergoing surgery or hypertension (registration: PROSPERO CRD42016038375). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception until December 2018. Outcomes were analysed as beta-blockers versus control for all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), incident HF or stroke. Two independent investigators abstracted the data, assessed the quality of the evidence and rated the certainty of evidence.
resultsWe identified 98 meta-analyses, including 284 unique RCTs and 1,617,523 patient-years of follow-up. In CAD, 12 meta-analyses (93 RCTs, 103,481 patients) showed that beta-blockers reduced mortality in analyses before routine reperfusion, but there was a lack of benefit in contemporary studies where ≥ 50% of patients received thrombolytics or intervention. Beta-blockers reduced incident MI at the expense of increased HF. In HF with reduced ejection fraction, 34 meta-analyses (66 RCTs, 35,383 patients) demonstrated a reduction in mortality and HF hospitalisation with beta-blockers in sinus rhythm, but not in atrial fibrillation. In patients undergoing surgery, 23 meta-analyses (89 RCTs, 19,211 patients) showed no effect of beta-blockers on mortality for cardiac surgery, but increased mortality in non-cardiac surgery. In non-cardiac surgery, beta-blockers reduced MI after surgery but increased the risk of stroke. In hypertension, 27 meta-analyses (36 RCTs, 260,549 patients) identified no benefit versus placebo, but beta-blockers were inferior to other agents for preventing mortality and stroke.
conclusionsBeta-blockers substantially reduce mortality in HF patients in sinus rhythm, but for other conditions, clinicians need to weigh up both benefit and potential risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.