Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32396624›Full record

ReviewEndocrine reviews2020

The Evolution of Insulin and How it Informs Therapy and Treatment Choices.

Irl B Hirsch, Rattan Juneja, John M Beals, Caryl J Antalis, Eugene E Wright

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05124457 (A Phase 2 Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial Determir Vs Neutral Protamine Hagedorn), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05124457 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Phase 2 Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial Determir Vs Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) In Pregnant Women: DETERMINE Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2022 to 2025Enrolled336ConditionsGestational Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsInsulin Detemir, Insulin NPH
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 218 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Peptide Hormones in Appetite Regulation: A Complex Network.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Molecular Research on Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irl B HirschUniversity of Washington Diabetes Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Rattan JunejaEli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
John M BealsEli Lilly and Company, Lilly Biotechnology Center, San Diego, California.
Caryl J AntalisEli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Eugene E WrightCharlotte Area Health Education Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USCoastal Area Health Education Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insulin has been available for the treatment of diabetes for almost a century, and the variety of insulin choices today represents many years of discovery and innovation. Insulin has gone from poorly defined extracts of animal pancreata to pure and precisely controlled formulations that can be prescribed and administered with high accuracy and predictability of action. Modifications of the insulin formulation and of the insulin molecule itself have made it possible to approximate the natural endogenous insulin response. Insulin and insulin formulations had to be designed to produce either a constant low basal level of insulin or the spikes of insulin released in response to meals. We discuss how the biochemical properties of endogenous insulin were exploited to either shorten or extend the time-action profiles of injectable insulins by varying the pharmacokinetics (time for appearance of insulin in the blood after injection) and pharmacodynamics (time-dependent changes in blood sugar after injection). This has resulted in rapid-acting, short-acting, intermediate-acting, and long-acting insulins, as well as mixtures and concentrated formulations. An understanding of how various insulins and formulations were designed to solve the challenges of insulin replacement will assist clinicians in meeting the needs of their individual patients.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinsHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinsinsulinlong-actingpharmacodynamicspharmacokineticsrapid-acting

Identifiers

PMID32396624
PMCPMC7366348
OpenAlexW3024580742

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.