ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2020
Analysis of the association between the XRCC2 rs3218536 polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CXCR4/CXCR7 gene-silencing suppresses ovarian cancer cell proliferation and tumour growth through modulation of the CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 chemokine axis and activation of MAPK signalling pathway.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Significant value of XRCC2 and XRCC9 expression in the prognosis of human ovarian carcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionResults conflict on the association between the XRCC2 rs3218536 polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk, despite wide-ranging investigations. This meta-analysis examines whether the XRCC2 rs3218536 polymorphism is associated with ovarian cancer risk. MATERIAL AND
methodsEligible case-control studies were searched in PubMed. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of 5,802 ovarian cancer cases and 9,390 controls from 7 articles published. The strength of association between XRCC2 rs3218536 polymorphism and ovarian cancer susceptibility was calculated using pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsNo statistically significant associations between XRCC2 rs3218536 polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk were found in any genetic models. However, a significant relationship with ovarian cancer risk was discovered when the high quality studies were pooled in the meta-analysis (AA vs. GG: OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37-0.94,
conclusionsThis meta-analysis shows that the XRCC2 rs3218536 polymorphism was associated with ovarian cancer risk overall for high quality studies. Non-Caucasian groups and high quality studies should be further studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.