Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32407347›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Effects of exercise, cognitive, and dual-task interventions on cognition in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Samuel Cooke, Kyla Pennington, Arwel Jones, Chris Bridle, Mark F Smith, Ffion Curtis

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Tailoring Exercise Prescription for Effective Diabetes Glucose Management.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samuel CookeLincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3027-7807
Kyla PenningtonSchool of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Arwel JonesLincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Chris BridleSchool of Psychology, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, United Kingdom.
Mark F SmithSchool of Sports and Exercise Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Ffion CurtisLincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious evidence has shown significant effects of exercise, cognitive and dual-task training for improving cognition in healthy cohorts. The effects of these types of interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus is unclear. The aim of this research was to systematically review evidence, and estimate the effect, of exercise, cognitive, and dual-task interventions on cognition in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

methodElectronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and MEDLINE were searched for ongoing and completed interventional trials investigating the effect of either an exercise, cognitive or dual-task intervention on cognition in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

resultsNine trials met the inclusion criteria-one dual-task, two cognitive, and six exercise. Meta-analyses of exercise trials showed no significant effects of exercise on measures of executive function (Stroop task, SMD = -0.31, 95% CI -0.71-0.09, P = 0.13, trail making test part A SMD = 0.28, 95% CI -0.20-0.77 P = 0.25, trail making test part B SMD = -0.15, 95% CI -0.64-0.34 P = 0.54, digit symbol SMD = 0.09, 95% CI -0.39-0.57 P = 0.72), and memory (immediate memory SMD = 0.20, 95% CI -0.28-0.69, P = 0.41 and delayed memory SMD = -0.06, 95% CI -0.55-0.42, P = 0.80). A meta-analysis could not be conducted using cognitive or dual-task data, but individual trials did report a favourable effect of interventions on cognition. Risk of bias was considered moderate to high for the majority of included trials.

conclusionsMeta-analyses of exercise trials identified a small effect size (0.31), which whilst not significant warrants further investigation. Larger and more robust trials are needed that report evidence using appropriate reporting guidelines (e.g. CONSORT) to increase confidence in the validity of results.

trial registrationProtocol was registered (CRD42017058526) on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).

Indexed as

Executive FunctionExerciseQuality of LifeCognitive DysfunctionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Humans

Identifiers

PMID32407347
PMCPMC7224461

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.