ArticleMolecular biology reports2020
Selection of suitable reference genes for qRT-PCR expression analysis of Codonopsis pilosula under different experimental conditions.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- High Expression of CpMAPK9 Increased Jasmonic Acid Levels Potentially Improving Root Rot Resistance inGenes · 2026Article
- Reference genes selection and validation in yam by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identifying the stability of housekeeping genes to be used for the quantitative real-time PCR normalization in retinal tissue of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Article
- The Dynamic Changes in the Main Substances inMetabolites · 2023Article
- Integrated omic techniques and their genomic features for invasive weeds.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Review
- Systematic identification of reference genes for qRT-PCR ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Article
- Selection and evaluation of reference genes for qRT-PCR of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi under different experimental conditions.Molecular biology reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Codonopsis pilosula is a well-known medicinal plant. Although its transcriptome sequence has been published, suitable reference genes have not been systematically identified for conducting expression analyses via quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). To screen appropriate genes for use with this species, we applied four different methods-GeNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and RefFinder-to evaluate the stability of 13 candidates: CpiEF1Bb, CpiCACS, CpiF-Box, Cpiβ-Tubulin, CpiGAPDH, CpiActin2, CpiAPT1, CpiActin7, CpiActin8, CpiRPL6, CpiHAF1, CpiTubulin6, and CpiUBQ12. Expression was examined by qRT-PCR for various tissue types, chemical treatments, and developmental stages. For all tested samples, CpiGAPDH proved to be the most stable. Comprehensive analysis indicated that the most stable internal reference genes were CpiF-Box and CpiCACS in different tissues and at different developmental stages, respectively. Under NaCl stress, CpiAPT1 was the best internal reference gene. For methyl jasmonate and abscisic acid treatments, CpiGAPDH and CpiF-Box, respectively, presented the highest degree of expression stability. Based on these findings, we chose CpiSPL9 as the target gene for validating the suitability of these selected reference genes. All of these results provide a foundation for accurate quantification of expression levels by genes of interest in C. pilosula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32410139What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.