ArticleBrain stimulation
Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Double Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of Biometrics-Guided Magnetic EEG Resonance Therapy (MeRT) Treatment Of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Home-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Postpartum Depression: the Feasibility Study and Pilot Study
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the Impact of Evidence-Based Mental Health Guidance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review and Qualitative Evaluation.JMIR mental health · 2023Pooled it
- Dosage consideration for transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke dysphagia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Digitalized transcranial electrical stimulation: A consensus statement.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Pooled it
- Assessment of health equity consideration in masking/PPE policies to contain COVID-19 using PROGRESS-plus framework: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2021Pooled it
- Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021Guideline
- Transcranial alternating current stimulation for treating spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: A randomized controlled trial.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Increasing resilience to stress by home-based transcranial stimulation.Research square · 2025Article
- Human Applications of Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation: A Systematic Review.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- tDCS and Cognitive Training for Fatigued and Cognitively Impaired People with Multiple Sclerosis: An SCED Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Electroencephalographic responses before, during, and after upper limb paired associative stimulation.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neurocognitive Functions in Moderate and Severe Depression: A Follow-up Study.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Improving mentalizing deficits in older age with region-specific transcranial direct current stimulation.GeroScience · 2024Article
- Long COVID in Brain Health Research: A Call to Action.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Treating depression at home with transcranial direct current stimulation: a feasibility study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Editorial: Neurotechnology for brain-body performance and health: insights from the 2022 Neuroergonomics and NYC Neuromodulation Conference.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2024Article
- Editorial: Neurotechnology for sensing the brain out of the lab: methods and applications for mobile functional neuroimaging.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2024Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors at 20 institutions in 19 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has broadly disrupted biomedical treatment and research including non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS). Moreover, the rapid onset of societal disruption and evolving regulatory restrictions may not have allowed for systematic planning of how clinical and research work may continue throughout the pandemic or be restarted as restrictions are abated. The urgency to provide and develop NIBS as an intervention for diverse neurological and mental health indications, and as a catalyst of fundamental brain research, is not dampened by the parallel efforts to address the most life-threatening aspects of COVID-19; rather in many cases the need for NIBS is heightened including the potential to mitigate mental health consequences related to COVID-19.
objectiveTo facilitate the re-establishment of access to NIBS clinical services and research operations during the current COVID-19 pandemic and possible future outbreaks, we develop and discuss a framework for balancing the importance of NIBS operations with safety considerations, while addressing the needs of all stakeholders. We focus on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and low intensity transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) - including transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS).
methodsThe present consensus paper provides guidelines and good practices for managing and reopening NIBS clinics and laboratories through the immediate and ongoing stages of COVID-19. The document reflects the analysis of experts with domain-relevant expertise spanning NIBS technology, clinical services, and basic and clinical research - with an international perspective. We outline regulatory aspects, human resources, NIBS optimization, as well as accommodations for specific demographics.
resultsA model based on three phases (early COVID-19 impact, current practices, and future preparation) with an 11-step checklist (spanning removing or streamlining in-person protocols, incorporating telemedicine, and addressing COVID-19-associated adverse events) is proposed. Recommendations on implementing social distancing and sterilization of NIBS related equipment, specific considerations of COVID-19 positive populations including mental health comorbidities, as well as considerations regarding regulatory and human resource in the era of COVID-19 are outlined. We discuss COVID-19 considerations specifically for clinical (sub-)populations including pediatric, stroke, addiction, and the elderly. Numerous case-examples across the world are described.
conclusionThere is an evident, and in cases urgent, need to maintain NIBS operations through the COVID-19 pandemic, including anticipating future pandemic waves and addressing effects of COVID-19 on brain and mind. The proposed robust and structured strategy aims to address the current and anticipated future challenges while maintaining scientific rigor and managing risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.