Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32415316›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2020

[General fracture principles and imaging characteristics].

Christian Fischer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian FischerZentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Christian.Fischer@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the process of fracture healing, two different types (direct and indirect) are observed, which can be distinguished by radiologic imaging. If a fracture insufficiently consolidates without further treatment, regardless of the duration of prior treatment, it is referred to as a "non-union". This occurs in about 10% of long bone fractures.

aimThe aim of this article is to provide an overview of the classification of fractures, an explanation of fracture healing and non-unions as well as their radiologic characteristics.

methodsThe diagnosis of fractures is based on physical examination and x‑ray with a minimum of two planes. If a soft tissue defect or complex fracture is suspected, a CT or MRI should be considered. For the treatment of non-unions, it might be helpful to expand the diagnostics to a CEUS (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) or DCE-MRI (dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging).

conclusionNon-unions represent a severe limitation for the patient's quality of life and are often associated with a long period of suffering. In recent years, CEUS has been shown to be a useful and precise method for the diagnosis and assessment of non-unions and as a surrogate parameter for fracture consolidation.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneQuality of LifeFracture HealingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonographyClassificationContrast-enhanced ultrasoundDynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagingFracture healingNon-union

Identifiers

PMID32415316
OpenAlexW3025206595

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.