ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2020
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for structural heart disease.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in transfusion-dependent thalassemia: A large cross-sectional cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Prospective Assessment of Cardiac Iron Deposition, Morphology, and Function by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Transfusion-Dependent and Neo-Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value and clinical impact of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients after sudden cardiac arrest: a retrospective study.Open heart · 2025Article
- Review
- Cardiac MRI in diagnosis, prognosis, and follow-up of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in children: current perspectives.The British journal of radiology · 2024Review
- MRI Quantification of Cardiac Structure and Function in Cardiomyopathy Patients.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Review
- Compact pediatric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocols.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Disrupting arrhythmia in a professional male wrestler athlete after rapid weight loss and high-intensity training-Case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has increasingly become a powerful imaging technique over the past few decades due to increasing knowledge about clinical applications, operator experience and technological advances, including the introduction of high field strength magnets, leading to improved signal-to-noise ratio. Its success is attributed to the free choice of imaging planes, the wide variety of imaging techniques, and the lack of harmful radiation. Developments in CMR have led to the accurate evaluation of cardiac structure, function and tissues characterisation, so this non-invasive technique has become a powerful tool for a broad range of cardiac pathologies. This review will provide an introduction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) physics, an overview of the current techniques and clinical application of CMR in structural heart disease, and illustrated examples of its use in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.