Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32432486›Full record

SynthesisCartilage2021

Outcomes of Partial Meniscectomy in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Tina Zhang, Julio J Jauregui, Michael Foster, Jonathan D Packer, Sean J Meredith, Natalie L Leong, R Frank Henn

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cartilage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Health-economic evaluation of meniscus tear treatments: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Can we Predict the Outcomes of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy?Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Current Rehabilitation Principles Following Meniscus Repairs.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tina ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7854-4433
Julio J JaureguiDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael FosterDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jonathan D PackerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sean J MeredithDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3725-5309
Natalie L LeongDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
R Frank HennDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

BLRD VA IK2 BX004879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveArthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. However, the indications for APM are controversial and obese patients may have worse outcomes. This study's primary purpose was to investigate differences in outcome after APM associated with elevated body mass index (BMI). Secondary objectives included differences in pathophysiology, surgical complications/failures, or osteoarthritis development.

designMEDLINE, EMBASE, and OVID databases were systematically searched for eligible studies reporting on APM outcomes at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Studies that did not include BMI categorization were excluded. Meta-analysis was conducted with random-effects modeling where data from at least 2 studies was available.

resultsA total of 16 articles were included. Overweight/obese BMI was associated with worse preoperative Lysholm (mean difference, -6.06 [95% CI, -11.70 to -0.42]) and visual analogue scale pain scores (0.43 [0.07 to 0.79]). Worse postoperative normalized knee-specific patient-reported outcome scores were also associated with obese BMI (-4.57 [-5.33 to -3.81]). There were no significant differences in clinical improvement or osteoarthritis progression among BMI groups. Two studies found higher complication/failure rates, 3 articles associated medial meniscus posterior root tears, and 1 article found differences in gene transcript expression with increased BMI.

conclusionsObesity is associated with worse knee function after APM, and patients with elevated BMI have worse preoperative knee pain and function. However, there is no difference in amount of improvement between elevated and normal BMI patients. Further prospective research is necessary to determine the comparative effectiveness of APM in patients with elevated BMI.

Indexed as

MeniscectomyArthroscopyBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleMenisci, TibialObesityOsteoarthritis, KneePainTibial Meniscus InjuriesTreatment Outcomebody mass index (BMI)kneemeniscectomymeniscus tearobesity

Identifiers

PMID32432486
PMCPMC8808876
OpenAlexW3026962172

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.