Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440836›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2020

Nationwide Survey on Actual Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes by Japanese Practitioners (NSAID Study-1): Glycemic, Weight, and Blood Pressure Management.

Keiko Arai, Tetsuo Nishikawa, Shohei Yuasa, Shin-Ichiro Shirabe, Yoko Matsuzawa, Shigeyuki Ohtsu, Koich Hirao, Hisao Mori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Trends in the Management of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Japanese Practitioners.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Keiko AraiArai Clinic, Yokohama, Japan. arai-cl@n04.itscom.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4691-8469
Tetsuo NishikawaNisikawa Clinic, Yokohama, Japan.
Shohei YuasaSyohei Clinic, Kamakura, Japan.
Shin-Ichiro ShirabeHealth Education Center Science Clinic, Yokohama, Japan.
Yoko MatsuzawaMatsuzawa Diabetes Clinic, Yokohama, Japan.
Shigeyuki OhtsuNakanoshima Diabetes Clinic, Kawasaki, Japan.
Koich HiraoHealth Education Center Science Clinic, Yokohama, Japan.
Hisao MoriYokohama Sotetsu Building Clinic of Internal Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConsidering the increase in the number of patients with diabetes, the quality of diabetes care provided by general practitioners (GP) is critical for preventing complications. We performed a nationwide survey to determine whether the diabetic management provided to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by Japanese practitioners is appropriate.

methodsWe randomly selected 463 clinics throughout Japan; 8070 patients with T2DM (6525 and 1545 under the care of GP and specialists [SP], respectively) were enrolled. We obtained information on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, age, height, body weight, diabetes type and treatment modality, blood pressure (BP), and hypertension or dyslipidemia from each patient. Additionally, we surveyed the collaborations among physicians.

resultsThe median HbA1c level of patients treated by GP was lower than that of patients treated by SP (6.8 [6.2-7.3], median [interquartile range] vs. 6.9 [6.5-7.5], p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients receiving insulin therapy was also higher (23.8%) among patients treated by SP than among those treated by GP (8.6%). Patients not receiving insulin therapy showed lower median HbA1c levels than those receiving insulin therapy, irrespective of the care provider. The mean body mass index of patients with HbA1c levels < 6.9% or > 9.0% cared for by SP was lower than that of those cared for by GP. The rate of target BP (< 140/90 mmHg) achievement was 73.2% and 73.3% among patients with T2DM and hypertension cared for by GP and SP, respectively. Furthermore, 88.2% of GP reported that consulting with SP was easy.

conclusionThe present study clearly demonstrated that many patients with T2DM are appropriately cared for by general practitioners instead of diabetes specialists in Japan, although the number of diabetes specialists is insufficient to cover all patients with diabetes.

Indexed as

Blood pressureBody weightCollaborationGeneral practitionersGlycemic controlNationwide surveyType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID32440836
PMCPMC7324449

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.