Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32443784›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Rho GTPases in Gynecologic Cancers: In-Depth Analysis toward the Paradigm Change from Reactive to Predictive, Preventive, and Personalized Medical Approach Benefiting the Patient and Healthcare.

Pavol Zubor, Zuzana Dankova, Zuzana Kolkova, Veronika Holubekova, Dusan Brany, Sandra Mersakova, Marek Samec, Alena Liskova, Lenka Koklesova, Peter Kubatka and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. iScience · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Pavol ZuborDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway.
Zuzana DankovaBiomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovak Republic.
Zuzana KolkovaBiomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovak Republic.
Veronika HolubekovaBiomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovak Republic.
Dusan BranyBiomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovak Republic.
Sandra MersakovaBiomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovak Republic.
Marek SamecDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Martin University Hospital and Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University of Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovak Republic, marek.samec@uniba.sk (M.S.).
Alena LiskovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Martin University Hospital and Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University of Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovak Republic, marek.samec@uniba.sk (M.S.).
Lenka KoklesovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Martin University Hospital and Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University of Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovak Republic, marek.samec@uniba.sk (M.S.).
Peter KubatkaDepartment of Medical Biology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 03601 Martin, Slovak Republic.
Jan BujnakDepartment of Oncogynecology, Kukuras Hospital, 07101 Michalovce, Slovak Republic.
Karol KajoDepartment of Pathology, St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute, 81250 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Milos MlyncekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty Hospital Nitra, Constantine the Philosopher University, 949 74 Nitra, Slovak Republic.
Frank A GiordanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Olga GolubnitschajaPredictive, Preventive and Personalised (3P) Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Comenius University Bratislava · SKMartin University Hospital · SKUniversity of Bonn · DECancer Institute (WIA) · INConstantine the Philosopher University in Nitra · SKOslo University Hospital · NOŠtefan Kukura Hospital in Michalovce · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rho guanosine triphospatases (GTPases) resemble a conserved family of GTP-binding proteins regulating actin cytoskeleton dynamics and several signaling pathways central for the cell. Rho GTPases create a so-called Ras-superfamily of GTPases subdivided into subgroups comprising at least 20 members. Rho GTPases play a key regulatory role in gene expression, cell cycle control and proliferation, epithelial cell polarity, cell migration, survival, and apoptosis, among others. They also have tissue-related functions including angiogenesis being involved in inflammatory and wound healing processes. Contextually, any abnormality in the Rho GTPase function may result in severe consequences at molecular, cellular, and tissue levels. Rho GTPases also play a key role in tumorigenesis and metastatic disease. Corresponding mechanisms include a number of targets such as kinases and scaffold/adaptor-like proteins initiating GTPases-related signaling cascades. The accumulated evidence demonstrates the oncogenic relevance of Rho GTPases for several solid malignancies including breast, liver, bladder, melanoma, testicular, lung, central nervous system (CNS), head and neck, cervical, and ovarian cancers. Furthermore, Rho GTPases play a crucial role in the development of radio- and chemoresistance e.g. under cisplatin-based cancer treatment. This article provides an in-depth overview on the role of Rho GTPases in gynecological cancers, highlights relevant signaling pathways and pathomechanisms, and sheds light on their involvement in tumor progression, metastatic spread, and radio/chemo resistance. In addition, insights into a spectrum of novel biomarkers and innovative approaches based on the paradigm shift from reactive to predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine are provided.

Indexed as

biomarker-setbreast cancercervical cancerendometrial cancerfunctiongynecologic oncologyhealingimpairmentsin-depth diagnosticsinflammationmetastatic diseasemolecular cellular tissue levelovarian cancersparadigm changepatient stratificationpredictive preventive personalized medicine (PPPM/3PM)prognosisregulationRho GTPasessignaling pathwaysstructuretherapy resistancetumorigenesis

Identifiers

PMID32443784
PMCPMC7281750
OpenAlexW3027773206

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.