Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32451821›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2020

Managing Diabetes in Hard to Reach Populations: A Review of Telehealth Interventions.

Anusha Verravanallur Appuswamy, Marisa E Desimone

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Recent Progress and Applications of Digital Technologies in Healthcare: A Review.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anusha Verravanallur AppuswamyDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
Marisa E DesimoneDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA. desimoma@upstate.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4701-080X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDiabetes mellitus is a leading chronic disease worldwide. Access to diabetes care varies widely and is influenced by multiple factors including social, geographic, and economic conditions. The use of technology to expand healthcare may bridge these barriers and improve access. Our aim was to review the evidence for the role of telehealth to expand access to quality diabetes care. RECENT

findingsThere is evidence that application of technology-based programs to deliver healthcare are both feasible and effective. These programs are accepted by both patients and providers, can reduce healthcare costs, and may redress inequalities in healthcare access. Technology-based care models can improve disease management, enhance efficiency and clinical decision-making, promote patient self-management skills, and promote patient centered care. Future research should focus on implementation of technology-based healthcare delivery programs on a larger scale.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusTelemedicineHealth Care CostsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansQuality of Health CareDiabetesRuralTelehealthTelemedicineUnderserved

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.