Trial reportCancer2020
A multi-institutional phase 2 trial of regorafenib in refractory advanced biliary tract cancer.
Trial report in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastrointestinal traits, common inflammatory disorders, gallstones, and biliary tract cancer: A network Mendelian randomization study.Journal of advanced research · 2026Pooled it
- Sunitinib as Second-Line Treatment in Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Results From the SUN-CK GERCOR Phase II Trial.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Trial
- Regorafenib plus modified gemcitabine-oxaliplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. The randomized phase Ib/II BREGO study.The oncologist · 2025Trial
- Targeted therapies and immunotherapies for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.Chinese medical journal · 2025Review
- Development and challenges in the treatment of advanced gallbladder cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- Efficacy of lenvatinib combined with TAS-102 as second-line therapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Interlinking pathways: a narrative review on the role of IL-6 in cancer and atherosclerosis.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2024Review
- Advances in targeted therapy of cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of medicine · 2024Review
- Research progress on prognostic factors of gallbladder carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Current Status of Targeted Therapy for Biliary Tract Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine.Cancers · 2024Review
- Focusing on the Immune Cells: Recent Advances in Immunotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2024Review
- Therapeutic Potential of Regorafenib in Cisplatin-Resistant Bladder Cancer with High Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Stemness Properties.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Efficacy and safety of PD‑1 inhibitor plus antiangiogenic treatment in patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Rational development of combination therapies for biliary tract cancers.Journal of hepatology · 2023Review
- Targeted therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma microenvironment.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Review
- Novel Pharmacological Options in the Treatment of Cholangiocarcinoma: Mechanisms of Resistance.Cancers · 2021Review
- Targeting the tumor microenvironment in cholangiocarcinoma: implications for therapy.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2021Review
- Development of Possible Next Line of Systemic Therapies for Gemcitabine-Resistant Biliary Tract Cancers: A Perspective from Clinical Trials.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Current options and future directions of systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRegorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting angiogenesis, oncogenesis, and cancer proliferation/metastasis. This study evaluated the efficacy of regorafenib in refractory biliary tract cancer (BTC) in a multi-institutional phase 2 study.
methodsPatients with BTC who progressed on at least 1 line of systemic therapy received regorafenib at 160 mg daily for 21 days on and 7 days off. The primary endpoint was 6-month overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were median OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rates. Pretreatment plasma was collected for cytokine evaluation.
resultsA total of 39 patients were enrolled, and 33 were evaluable for efficacy. The median PFS and OS were 3.7 and 5.4 months, respectively, with survival rates of 46.2% at 6 months, 35.9% at 12 months, and 25.6% at 18 months for the intention-to-treat population. For the 33 evaluable patients who received regorafenib for at least 3 weeks, the median PFS and OS were 3.9 and 6.7 months, respectively, with survival rates of 51.5% at 6 months, 39.4% at 12 months, and 27.3% at 18 months. The objective response rate was 9.1%, and the disease control rate was 63.6%. Twenty-eight patients (71.8%) experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. Among the 23 cytokines analyzed, elevated baseline vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D) was associated with shorter PFS, whereas elevated baseline interleukin 6 (IL-6) and glycoprotein 130 (GP130) were associated with shorter OS.
conclusionsRegorafenib demonstrated modest clinical efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with BTC. Further exploration of biomarkers is warranted to identify a group of patients with BTC who may benefit from regorafenib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.