Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32456281›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2020

Meat Consumption, Cognitive Function and Disorders: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis and Meta-Analysis.

Huifeng Zhang, Laura Hardie, Areej O Bawajeeh, Janet Cade

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06690892 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Understanding the Cognitive and Brain Health Effects of Increasing Beef Consumption in Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Nebraska LincolnRan2025 to 2026Enrolled240ConditionsDietary Intervention, Dietary Proteins, Dietary Assessment, Cognitive Ability, GeneralArmsReady-to-eat beef in frozen, 5-oz packages, Ready-to-eat beef in frozen, 1-oz packages
NCT07031076 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Investigating the Cognitive and Brain Health Benefits of Lean Pork Consumption

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Nebraska LincolnRan2025 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsDietary Intervention, Dietary Proteins, Dietary Assessment, Older Adults (65 Years and Older)ArmsReady-to-eat lean pork in frozen, 5-oz packages
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Modifiable risk and protective factors for dementia: an overview of established and emerging evidence].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Huifeng ZhangNutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9818-7904
Laura HardieDivision of Clinical and Population Sciences, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Areej O BawajeehNutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Janet CadeNutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3421-0121
University of Leeds · GB

Funding

China Scholarship Council 201806010423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, and other forms of dementia are increasing in prevalence worldwide, while global dietary patterns are transitioning to a 'western type' with increasing meat consumption. Studies which have explored the associations between cognitive function and meat intakes have produced inconsistent findings. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the evidence linking meat intake with cognitive disorders. Twenty-nine studies were retrieved, including twelve cohort, three case-control, thirteen cross-sectional studies, and one intervention study. The majority (21/29) showed that meat consumption was not significantly associated with cognitive function or disorders. Meta-analysis of five studies showed no significant differences in meat consumption between cases with cognitive disorders and controls (standardized mean difference = -0.32, 95% CI: -1.01, 0.36); however, there was considerable heterogeneity. In contrast, a meta-analysis of five studies showed reduced odds of cognitive disorders by consuming meat weekly or more (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.88); however, potential publication bias was noted in relation to this finding. Overall, there was no strong association between meat intake and cognitive disorders. However, the evidence base was limited, requiring more studies of high quality to isolate the specific effect of meat consumption from dietary patterns to confirm these associations.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitionCognition DisordersDietFeeding BehaviorMeatAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAlzheimer’s diseasecognitive disorderscognitive impairmentdementiameat consumption

Identifiers

PMID32456281
PMCPMC7285210
OpenAlexW3027691067

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.