Evidence mapPaperPMID 32466962Full record

Observational studySurgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery2020

Gut microbiota differs a decade after bariatric surgery relative to a nonsurgical comparison group.

Jacob G Mabey, John M Chaston, Daphne G Castro, Ted D Adams, Steven C Hunt, Lance E Davidson

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor (Journal of asthma and allergy · 2025
    Article
  6. Virulence · 2024
    Review
  7. Health and Disease:Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacob G MabeyDepartment of Exercise Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah. Electronic address: jacobmabey@gmail.com.
John M ChastonDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Daphne G CastroDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Ted D AdamsIntermountain Live Well Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Steven C HuntDepartment of Genetic Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Lance E DavidsonDepartment of Exercise Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.

Funding

MORBIDITY &MORTALITY RELATED TO GASTRIC BYPASS SURGERYR01DK055006 · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · 2000 to 2004
$3.0M
INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTORS (SOMATOMEDINS)--BIOSYNTHESIS AND ACTIONZ01DK055006 · DIABETES, DIGESTIVE, KIDNEY DISEASES · 1986 to 2005
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK055006NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK055006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have assessed differences in the gut microbiota composition after bariatric surgery in the long term or whether differences are correlated with remission of type 2 diabetes.

objectivesThis observational study assessed differences in the gut microbiota between individuals at up to 13 years after surgery and a comparison group of individuals with severe obesity. The relationship between type 2 diabetes remission and the gut microbiota was also assessed.

settingUniversity.

methodsStool samples were collected from individuals completing bariatric surgery (surgery group; n = 16) and individuals with severe obesity that did not receive surgery (nonsurgery group; n = 19) as part of the 12-year follow-up in the Utah Obesity Study. Metabolic health data were collected at baseline and the follow-up examination. The gut microbiota was quantified by sequencing the V4 region of the 16 S rRNA gene. Significant differences in microbiota composition with surgery and other covariates were determined by Unifrac distance analysis and permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Significant differences in the relative abundance of individual bacterial taxa were assessed using analysis of composition of microbiomes software.

resultsThe surgery group had higher relative abundances of Verrucomicrobiaceae (5.7 ± 1.3% versus 1.1 ± .3%) and Streptococcaceae (6.3 ± 1.0% versus 3.2 ± .8%), but lower relative abundances of Bacteroidaceae (8.8 ± 1.8% versus 18.6 ± 2.3%) 10.6 years after surgery. In a small subset of 8 individuals, a higher relative abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila was correlated with type 2 diabetes remission.

conclusionsDifferences in the gut microbiota are evident a decade after bariatric surgery compared with individuals with severe obesity that did not undergo surgery. The observed long-term differences are consistent with previous findings.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeObesity, MorbidHumansObesityAkkermansia muciniphilaBariatric surgeryGut microbiotaLong-term follow-upType 2 diabetes remissionUtah Obesity Study

Identifiers

PMID32466962
PMCPMC7483956

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.