Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32467222›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open diabetes research & care2020

Systematic review and meta-analysis of mouse models of diabetes-associated ulcers.

Pacific Huynh, James Phie, Smriti Murali Krishna, Jonathan Golledge

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Stem Cell-Based Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Wound Reporting in Animal and Human Preclinical Studies (WRAHPS) Guidelines.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
  17. Spray film-forming system formulation ofJournal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pacific HuynhQueensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6729-2296
James PhieQueensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Smriti Murali KrishnaQueensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Jonathan GolledgeQueensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia jonathan.golledge@jcu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5779-8848
James Cook University · AUTownsville Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse models are frequently used to study diabetes-associated ulcers, however, whether these models accurately simulate impaired wound healing has not been thoroughly investigated. This systematic review aimed to determine whether wound healing is impaired in mouse models of diabetes and assess the quality of the past research. A systematic literature search was performed of publicly available databases to identify original articles examining wound healing in mouse models of diabetes. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the effect of diabetes on wound healing rate using random effect models. A meta-regression was performed to examine the effect of diabetes duration on wound healing impairment. The quality of the included studies was also assessed using two newly developed tools. 77 studies using eight different models of diabetes within 678 non-diabetic and 720 diabetic mice were included. Meta-analysis showed that wound healing was impaired in all eight models. Meta-regression suggested that longer duration of diabetes prior to wound induction was correlated with greater degree of wound healing impairment. Pairwise comparisons suggested that non-obese diabetic mice exhibited more severe wound healing impairment compared with

Indexed as

Diabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMiceUlcerWound Healinglaboratory research in diabetesmeta-analysistransgenic and knockout miceulcer(s)

Identifiers

PMID32467222
PMCPMC7259859
OpenAlexW3032615684

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.