Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32467344›Full record

SynthesisCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2020

A Systematic Literature Review of Whole Exome and Genome Sequencing Population Studies of Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer.

Melissa Rotunno, Rolando Barajas, Mindy Clyne, Elise Hoover, Naoko I Simonds, Tram Kim Lam, Leah E Mechanic, Alisa M Goldstein, Elizabeth M Gillanders

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Opportunities for Gene and Environment Research in Cancer: An Updated Review of NCI's Extramural Grant Portfolio.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa RotunnoNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland. rotunnom@mail.nih.gov.
Rolando BarajasNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mindy ClyneNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-9884-7856
Elise HooverNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Naoko I SimondsScientific Consulting Group, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-6651-9719
Tram Kim LamNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Leah E MechanicNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Alisa M Goldstein *National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-7538-3582
Elizabeth M Gillanders *National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Department of Health and Human Services · USScientific Consulting Group · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201400011CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201400011I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies in cancer research has accelerated the discovery of somatic mutations; however, progress in the identification of germline variation associated with cancer risk is less clear. We conducted a systematic literature review of cancer genetic susceptibility studies that used NGS technologies at an exome/genome-wide scale to obtain a fuller understanding of the research landscape to date and to inform future studies. The variability across studies on methodologies and reporting was considerable. Most studies sequenced few high-risk (mainly European) families, used a candidate analysis approach, and identified potential cancer-related germline variants or genes in a small fraction of the sequenced cancer cases. This review highlights the importance of establishing consensus on standards for the application and reporting of variants filtering strategies. It also describes the progress in the identification of cancer-related germline variation to date. These findings point to the untapped potential in conducting studies with appropriately sized and racially diverse families and populations, combining results across studies and expanding beyond a candidate analysis approach to advance the discovery of genetic variation that accounts for the unexplained cancer heritability.

Indexed as

ExomeGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumans

Identifiers

PMID32467344
PMCPMC8279039
OpenAlexW3029027479

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.