Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32476540›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Complete Revascularization by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Yousif Ahmad, James P Howard, Ahran Arnold, Megha Prasad, Henry Seligman, Christopher M Cook, Takayuki Warisawa, Matthew Shun-Shun, Ziad Ali, Manish A Parikh and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes : Statement of endorsement by the NVVC.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Complete revascularization in acute myocardial infarction: a clinical review.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in High-Risk Settings.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yousif AhmadColumbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
James P HowardNational Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom.
Ahran ArnoldNational Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom.
Megha PrasadColumbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Henry SeligmanNational Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom.
Christopher M CookNational Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom.
Takayuki WarisawaNational Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom.
Matthew Shun-ShunNational Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom.
Ziad AliColumbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Manish A ParikhColumbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Rasha Al-LameeNational Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom.
Sayan SenNational Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom.
Darrel FrancisNational Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London United Kingdom.
Jeffrey W MosesColumbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Martin B LeonColumbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Gregg W StoneCardiovascular Research Foundation New York NY.
Dimitri KarmpaliotisColumbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York NY.
Imperial College London · GBNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USCardiovascular Institute of the South · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background For patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease, the optimal treatment of the non-infarct-related artery has been controversial. This up-to-date meta-analysis focusing on individual clinical end points was performed to further evaluate the benefit of complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods and Results We systematically identified all randomized trials comparing complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention to culprit-only revascularization for multivessel disease in STEMI and performed a random-effects meta-analysis. The primary efficacy end point was cardiovascular death analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary end points included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization. Ten studies (7542 patients) were included: 3664 patients were randomized to complete revascularization and 3878 to culprit-only revascularization. Across all patients, complete revascularization was superior to culprit-only revascularization for reduction in the risk of cardiovascular death (relative risk [RR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.98;

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTime FactorsTreatment Outcomepercutaneous coronary interventionrevascularizationST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID32476540
PMCPMC7429036
OpenAlexW3030131072

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.