ArticleBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2020
Selection and subsequent physiological characterization of industrial
Article in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for co-production of ethanol and 3-methyl-1-butanol from sugarcane molasses.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2025Article
- Production of HMF-derivatives from wine residues using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as whole-cell biocatalyst.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2025Article
- Thermotolerant yeasts promoting climate-resilient bioproduction.FEMS yeast research · 2025Review
- zIncubascope: Long-term quantitative imaging of multi-cellular assemblies inside an incubator.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Genotypic and Phenotypic Diversity ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Thermotolerance improvement of engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae ERG5 Delta ERG4 Delta ERG3 Delta, molecular mechanism, and its application in corn ethanol production.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2023Article
- Article
- Vertical growth dynamics of biofilms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Current Ethanol Production Requirements for the YeastInternational journal of microbiology · 2022Review
- Differential proteomic analysis by SWATH-MS unravels the most dominant mechanisms underlying yeast adaptation to non-optimal temperatures under anaerobic conditions.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- EngineeredBioengineered · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A phenotypic screening of 12 industrial yeast strains and the well-studied laboratory strain CEN.PK113-7D at cultivation temperatures between 12 °C and 40 °C revealed significant differences in maximum growth rates and temperature tolerance. From those 12, two strains, one performing best at 12 °C and the other at 40 °C, plus the laboratory strain, were selected for further physiological characterization in well-controlled bioreactors. The strains were grown in anaerobic chemostats, at a fixed specific growth rate of 0.03 h
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.