Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32486007›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

No Significant Differences in Muscle Growth and Strength Development When Consuming Soy and Whey Protein Supplements Matched for Leucine Following a 12 Week Resistance Training Program in Men and Women: A Randomized Trial.

Heidi M Lynch, Matthew P Buman, Jared M Dickinson, Lynda B Ransdell, Carol S Johnston, Christopher M Wharton

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heidi M LynchDepartment of Kinesiology, Point Loma Nazarene University, San Diego, CA 92106, USA.
Matthew P BumanCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Jared M DickinsonHealth Sciences, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA, 98926, USA.
Lynda B RansdellCollege of Health and Human Services, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.
Carol S JohnstonCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Christopher M WhartonCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are conflicting reports regarding the efficacy of plant versus animal-derived protein to support muscle and strength development with resistance training. The purpose of this study was to determine whether soy and whey protein supplements matched for leucine would comparably support strength increases and muscle growth following 12 weeks of resistance training. Sixty-one untrained young men (

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsLeucineMuscle StrengthResistance TrainingSoybean ProteinsWhey ProteinsBody CompositionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalYoung AdultLeucineSoybean ProteinsWhey Proteinsleucinemusclemuscle strengthskeletal

Identifiers

PMID32486007
PMCPMC7312446

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.