ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2020
Comparisons of skin microvascular changes in patients with primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Clinical value of sublingual microcirculatory dysfunction for screening for primary aldosteronism in hypertensive patients.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Intra-Renal Stiffness in Patients with Primary Aldosteronism.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2022Article
- Clinical impacts of endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation assessment on primary aldosteronism.Endocrine connections · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of our cross-sectional study was to evaluate skin microvascular alterations in patients with hypertension secondary to primary aldosteronism (PA) and in subjects with essential hypertension (EH). Skin microcirculation was detected by nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) and laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI), both noninvasive techniques for the evaluation of digital capillaroscopic damage and hand skin blood perfusion. From September 2018 to April 2019, we consecutively enrolled 80 patients, of whom 42 had PA and 38 had EH. A morphological and structural study of cutaneous microcirculation was carried out through NVC, while functional evaluation of the peripheral microcirculation was carried out with LDPI. Using LDPI indices, dermal perfusion gradients were calculated in various regions of interest at the level of the back of the hand (ROI1 and ROI2). No differences between the two groups in NVC parameters were found. In contrast, LDPI showed worse skin perfusion parameters in patients with PA compared with patients with EH (ROI1: 143.9 ± 29.9 pU vs 163.3 ± 35.2 pU, p = 0.01; perfusion gradient ROI1-ROI2: 62.4 ± 28.8 pU vs 79.3 ± 33.5 pU, p = 0.019). Furthermore, the ROI1-ROI2 (proximal-distal) perfusion gradient was negatively correlated with aldosterone plasma levels (r -0.269; p = 0.017). Multivariate analysis showed that aldosterone was significantly associated with the ROI1-ROI2 perfusion gradient (b -0.220; p = 0.044). Patients with PA showed altered skin perfusion and greater microvascular dysfunction compared with the EH group. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that aldosterone may have a pathophysiological role in microvascular remodeling in patients with PA, with predominant functional dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32488215What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.