Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32492154›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2020

Perspective: Do Fasting, Caloric Restriction, and Diets Increase Sensitivity to Radiotherapy? A Literature Review.

Philippe Icard, Luc Ollivier, Patricia Forgez, Joelle Otz, Marco Alifano, Ludovic Fournel, Mauro Loi, Juliette Thariat

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Calorie restriction and breast cancer treatment: a mini-review.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Metabolic Strategies for Inhibiting Cancer Development.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Philippe IcardUniversité Caen Normandie, Normandie University, UNICAEN, Medical School, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.
Luc OllivierCentre Hospitalier de Brest, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.
Patricia ForgezINSERM UMR-S 1124, Cellular Homeostasis and Cancer, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France.
Joelle OtzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Marco AlifanoService de Chirurgie Thoracique, Hôpital Cochin, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre, APHP, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France.
Ludovic FournelService de Chirurgie Thoracique, Hôpital Cochin, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre, APHP, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France.
Mauro LoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Paris Est University Hospitals, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Juliette ThariatUniversité Caen Normandie, Normandie University, UNICAEN, Medical School, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.
Inserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRInstitut Curie · FRParis-Est Sup · FRUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caloric starvation, as well as various diets, has been proposed to increase the oxidative DNA damage induced by radiotherapy (RT). However, some diets could have dual effects, sometimes promoting cancer growth, whereas proposing caloric restriction may appear counterproductive during RT considering that the maintenance of weight is a major factor for the success of this therapy. A systematic review was performed via a PubMed search on RT and fasting, or caloric restriction, ketogenic diet (>75% of fat-derived energy intake), protein starvation, amino acid restriction, as well as the Warburg effect. Twenty-six eligible original articles (17 preclinical studies and 9 clinical noncontrolled studies on low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets popularized as ketogenic diets, representing a total of 77 patients) were included. Preclinical experiments suggest that a short period of fasting prior to radiation, and/or transient caloric restriction during treatment course, can increase tumor responsiveness. These regimens promote accumulation of oxidative lesions and insufficient repair, subsequently leading to cancer cell death. Due to their more flexible metabolism, healthy cells should be less sensitive, shifting their metabolism to support survival and repair. Interestingly, these regimens might stimulate an acute anticancer immune response, and may be of particular interest in tumors with high glucose uptake on positron emission tomography scan, a phenotype associated with poor survival and resistance to RT. Preclinical studies with ketogenic diets yielded more conflicting results, perhaps because cancer cells can sometimes metabolize fatty acids and/or ketone bodies. Randomized trials are awaited to specify the role of each strategy according to the clinical setting, although more stringent definitions of proposed diet, nutritional status, and consensual criteria for tumor response assessment are needed. In conclusion, dietary interventions during RT could be a simple and medically economical and inexpensive method that may deserve to be tested to improve efficiency of radiation.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionDiet, KetogenicDiet, High-FatEnergy IntakeFastingHumanscaloric restrictionfastingimmunityketogenic dietradiotherapyWarburg effect

Identifiers

PMID32492154
PMCPMC7490158
OpenAlexW3029220062

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.