Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493308›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Medical students as health coaches: adding value for patients and students.

Arti Maini, Molly Fyfe, Sonia Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lifestyle Medicine in Medical Education: Maximizing Impact.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arti MainiMedical Education Innovation and Research Centre (MEdIC), School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Room 331, 3rd floor Reynolds Building, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstan's Rd, London, W6 8RP, UK. a.maini@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0951-5604
Molly FyfeMedical Education Innovation and Research Centre (MEdIC), School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Room 331, 3rd floor Reynolds Building, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstan's Rd, London, W6 8RP, UK.
Sonia KumarMedical Education Innovation and Research Centre (MEdIC), School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Room 331, 3rd floor Reynolds Building, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstan's Rd, London, W6 8RP, UK.
Imperial College London · GBCharing Cross Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderlying the global burden of chronic disease are common and modifiable risk factors such as unhealthy diet, physical inactivity and tobacco use. Health coaching is being introduced into healthcare as an effective tool in facilitating behaviour change and addressing lifestyle risk factors in patients. Although some medical schools are training students in health coaching, there is little research on this emerging practice. This qualitative study explores the experience and application of health coaching approaches by third year medical students that have been trained in health coaching.

methodsSix focus groups were conducted with medical students (n = 39) who had participated in an experiential health coaching training module and practiced their health coaching skills in primary care settings. Interactive facilitated discussions between students aimed to explore experiences of health coaching, how this related to their ongoing practice, and their perceived impacts of engagement with patients. Data was thematically analysed.

resultsThemes emerged around 'mindset', 'skills', 'application of skills', 'perceived value' and 'context'. Training in health coaching prompted a shift towards a non-judgemental, solution-oriented mindset in which students increasingly accepted the ability of each person to define their needs and identify individually appropriate solutions. Mindset change supported skill development in person-centred communication, active listening, and self-refection. Mindset and skills related to changes in how students conducted patient consultations, their practice of self-refection, and their personal relationships. Perceived value of coaching approaches reinforced mindset. Students described facilitators to their coaching practice, and also tensions due to misalignment between their coaching mindset and ongoing practices in medical education and service delivery.

conclusionsTraining medical students in health coaching and supporting them to contribute meaningfully through empowering patients in real-world settings can help develop students' professional identity and a non-judgemental, solution-oriented mindset and skills in self-reflection, person-centred care and facilitating health behaviour change.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, MedicalHealth PromotionMentoringStudents, MedicalHumansCommunication skillsHealth coachingPatient-centred care

Identifiers

PMID32493308
PMCPMC7271500
OpenAlexW3028598124

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.