Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32496203›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Text Message-Based Intervention to Reduce Overuse of Alcohol in Emergency Department Patients: Controlled Proof-of-Concept Trial.

Elizabeth Burner, Mark Zhang, Sophie Terp, Kelsey Ford Bench, Joshua Lee, Chun Nok Lam, Jesus R Torres, Michael Menchine, Sanjay Arora

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02158949 (Mobilizing to Reduce Overuse of Alcohol in Emergency Department Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02158949 nacompletednot on this map

Mobilizing to Reduce Overuse of Alcohol in Emergency Department Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2014 to 2014Enrolled48ConditionsAlcohol AbuseArmsmROAD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth BurnerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4489-6673
Mark ZhangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5786-8327
Sophie TerpDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9841-7186
Kelsey Ford BenchDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0903-6010
Joshua LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9544-2244
Chun Nok LamDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8646-9664
Jesus R TorresSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6153-3914
Michael MenchineDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9292-4996
Sanjay AroraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7234-2398

Funding

Trial to Examine Text Message-based mHealth in Emergency department patients with Diabetes with Family And friends Network Supporters (TExT-MED+FANS)K23DK106538 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BURNER, ELIZABETH RHEA ERWIN · 2016 to 2019
$772k
ED Visits and Hospitalizations for Preventable Conditions: Determinants and CostsF32HS022402 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TERP, SOPHIE · 2013 to 2013
$62k
AHRQ HHS F32 HS022402NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK106538NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD009384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department (ED) patients have high rates of risky alcohol use, and an ED visit offers an opportunity to intervene. ED-based screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) reduces alcohol use and health care costs. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions may expand the impact of SBIRTs but are understudied in low-resource ED populations.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of and patient satisfaction with a text-based mHealth extension of an ED screening program to reduce risky alcohol use in low-income, urban patients.

methodsResearch assistants screened a convenience sample of ED patients in person for risky alcohol use via the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Patients who reported AUDIT scores ≥8 and <20 were informed of their AUDIT score and risk. RAs invited patients with SMS text message-capable phones to receive mROAD (mobilizing to Reduce Overuse of Alcohol in the ED), an SMS text message-based extension of the ED screening program. mROAD is a 7-day program of twice-daily SMS text messages based on the National Institutes of Health's Rethinking Drinking campaign. Participants were allocated to a control group (daily sham text messages without specific guidance on behaviors, such as "Thanks for taking part!") or to the mROAD intervention group. Patients were interviewed at 30 days to assess acceptability, satisfaction, and changes in drinking behavior. Satisfaction was examined descriptively. Pre and post measurements of drinking behaviors and motivation were compared, as were differences in change scores between the intervention arms.

resultsOf 1028 patients screened, 95 (9.2%) exhibited risky alcohol use based on AUDIT, and 23/95 (24%) of those patients did not own an SMS text messaging-capable phone; this left 72/95 (76%) eligible patients. Among eligible participants, 48/72 (67%) agreed to enroll; 31/48 (65%) achieved follow-up (18/24 (75%) in the intervention group and 13/24 (55%) in the control group). Participants who completed follow-up reported high satisfaction. Changes in behavior were similar between the arms. Overall, the number of drinking days reported in the prior 30 days decreased by 5.0 (95% CI 1.7-8.3; P=.004), and the number of heavy drinking days decreased by 4.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 7.15, P=.01). Patients reported an 11-point increase (95% CI 2.6-20, P=.01, 10% overall increase) in motivation to change alcohol use via the Change Questionnaire. The were no statistical differences in drinking days, heavy drinking days, or motivation to change between the arms.

conclusionsThe mROAD trial was feasible. Over three-quarters of ED patients with risky alcohol use owned a text message-capable phone, and two-thirds of these patients were willing to participate; only 1 patient opted out of the intervention. Although 35% of patients were lost to follow-up at 30 days, those patients who did follow up had favorable impressions of the program; more than 90% reported that SMS text messages were a "good way to teach," and 89% of intervention arm participants enjoyed the program and found that the messages were motivating. Both the mROAD and sham message groups showed promising changes in alcohol use and motivation to change. mROAD is a feasible intervention that may reduce rates of risky alcohol use in ED patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02158949; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02158949.

Indexed as

Text MessagingAlcoholismEmergency Service, HospitalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationUnited Statesalcohol interventionalcohol misuseemergency departmentmhealth

Identifiers

PMID32496203
PMCPMC7303828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.