Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32503331›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2020

Exploring the Lipidome: Current Lipid Extraction Techniques for Mass Spectrometry Analysis.

Julian Aldana, Adriana Romero-Otero, Mónica P Cala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Virulence · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Omics Technologies in Molecular Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recent Analytical Methodologies in Lipid Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julian AldanaMetabolomics Core Facility-MetCore, Vicepresidency for Research, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 No. 18A-12, Bogota 111711, Colombia.
Adriana Romero-OteroMetabolomics Core Facility-MetCore, Vicepresidency for Research, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 No. 18A-12, Bogota 111711, Colombia.
Mónica P CalaMetabolomics Core Facility-MetCore, Vicepresidency for Research, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 No. 18A-12, Bogota 111711, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, high-throughput lipid profiling has contributed to understand the biological, physiological and pathological roles of lipids in living organisms. Across all kingdoms of life, important cell and systemic processes are mediated by lipids including compartmentalization, signaling and energy homeostasis. Despite important advances in liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, sample extraction procedures remain a bottleneck in lipidomic studies, since the wide structural diversity of lipids imposes a constrain in the type and amount of lipids extracted. Differences in extraction yield across lipid classes can induce a bias on down-stream analysis and outcomes. This review aims to summarize current lipid extraction techniques used for untargeted and targeted studies based on mass spectrometry. Considerations, applications, and limitations of these techniques are discussed when used to extract lipids in complex biological matrices, such as tissues, biofluids, foods, and microorganisms.

Indexed as

extractionlipidstargeted lipidomicsuntargeted lipidomics

Identifiers

PMID32503331
PMCPMC7345237

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.