Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32504038›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2020

Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema pathways and management: UK Consensus Working Group.

Winfried M Amoaku, Faruque Ghanchi, Clare Bailey, Sanjiv Banerjee, Somnath Banerjee, Louise Downey, Richard Gale, Robin Hamilton, Kamlesh Khunti, Esther Posner and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 97 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Inflammatory Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Winfried M AmoakuAcademic Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Eye and ENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. winfried.amoaku@nottingham.ac.uk.
Faruque GhanchiOphthalmology, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Clare BaileyEye Clinic, Bristol Eye Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Sanjiv BanerjeeEye Clinic, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff and Diabetic Eye Screening Wales, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Somnath BanerjeeOphthalmology Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Louise DowneyHull and East Yorkshire Eye Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospital, Hull, UK.
Richard GaleEye Clinic, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
Robin HamiltonMedical Retina Services, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kamlesh KhuntiLeicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Gwendolen Road, Leicester, UK.
Esther PosnerWestern Eye Hospital, Marylebone, London, UK.
Fahd QuhillOphthalmology, The Royal Hallamshire NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Stephen RobinsonDiabetes Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Roopa SettyOphthalmology, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Dawn SimMedical Retina Services, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Deepali VarmaSunderland Eye Infirmary, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK.
Hemal MehtaOphthalmology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBPublic Health Wales · GBBristol Eye Hospital · GBHull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBSouth Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBWestern Eye Hospital · GBYork Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of diabetic retinopathy (DR) has evolved considerably over the past decade, with the availability of new technologies (diagnostic and therapeutic). As such, the existing Royal College of Ophthalmologists DR Guidelines (2013) are outdated, and to the best of our knowledge are not under revision at present. Furthermore, there are no other UK guidelines covering all available treatments, and there seems to be significant variation around the UK in the management of diabetic macular oedema (DMO). This manuscript provides a summary of reviews the pathogenesis of DR and DMO, including role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and non-VEGF cytokines, clinical grading/classification of DMO vis a vis current terminology (of centre-involving [CI-DMO], or non-centre involving [nCI-DMO], systemic risks and their management). The excellent UK DR Screening (DRS) service has continued to evolve and remains world-leading. However, challenges remain, as there are significant variations in equipment used, and reproducible standards of DMO screening nationally. The interphase between DRS and the hospital eye service can only be strengthened with further improvements. The role of modern technology including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and wide-field imaging, and working practices including virtual clinics and their potential in increasing clinic capacity and improving patient experiences and outcomes are discussed. Similarly, potential roles of home monitoring in diabetic eyes in the future are explored. The role of pharmacological (intravitreal injections [IVT] of anti-VEGFs and steroids) and laser therapies are summarised. Generally, IVT anti-VEGF are offered as first line pharmacologic therapy. As requirements of diabetic patients in particular patient groups may vary, including pregnant women, children, and persons with learning difficulties, it is important that DR management is personalised in such particular patient groups. First choice therapy needs to be individualised in these cases and may be intravitreal steroids rather than the standard choice of anti-VEGF agents. Some of these, but not all, are discussed in this document.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyMacular EdemaAngiogenesis InhibitorsChildFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsPregnancyTomography, Optical CoherenceUnited KingdomVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID32504038
PMCPMC7337227
OpenAlexW3033336739

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.