Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509754›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Natural Polymeric Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration.

Miriam Filippi, Gordian Born, Mansoor Chaaban, Arnaud Scherberich

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 360 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Natural Polymers in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR).Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  4. Biomimetic Scaffold of Chitosan fromAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Updates on Bone Grafts and Substitutes.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025
    Article
  15. [Updates on Bone Grafts and Substitutes].Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miriam FilippiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Gordian BornDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Mansoor ChaabanDepartment of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Arnaud ScherberichDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite considerable advances in microsurgical techniques over the past decades, bone tissue remains a challenging arena to obtain a satisfying functional and structural restoration after damage. Through the production of substituting materials mimicking the physical and biological properties of the healthy tissue, tissue engineering strategies address an urgent clinical need for therapeutic alternatives to bone autografts. By virtue of their structural versatility, polymers have a predominant role in generating the biodegradable matrices that hold the cells

Indexed as

bone tissuenatural polymerregenerationscaffoldtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32509754
PMCPMC7253672
OpenAlexW3026984333

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.