Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32512908›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Tooth Formation: Are the Hardest Tissues of Human Body Hard to Regenerate?

Juliana Baranova, Dominik Büchner, Werner Götz, Margit Schulze, Edda Tobiasch

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tooth regeneration in animals. A systematic review.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Juliana BaranovaDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes 748, Vila Universitária, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4420-529X
Dominik BüchnerDepartment of Natural Sciences, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, von-Liebig-Straße 20, 53359 Rheinbach, NRW, Germany.
Werner GötzOral Biology Laboratory, Department of Orthodontics, Dental Hospital of the University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstraße 17, 53111 Bonn, NRW, Germany.
Margit SchulzeDepartment of Natural Sciences, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, von-Liebig-Straße 20, 53359 Rheinbach, NRW, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8975-1753
Edda TobiaschDepartment of Natural Sciences, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, von-Liebig-Straße 20, 53359 Rheinbach, NRW, Germany.
Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg · DEUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13FH012PB2Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13FH019IX5Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13FH569IX6Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 1720X06Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst 54669218Ministerium für Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen 005-1703-0017Ministerium für Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen z1112fh012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With increasing life expectancy, demands for dental tissue and whole-tooth regeneration are becoming more significant. Despite great progress in medicine, including regenerative therapies, the complex structure of dental tissues introduces several challenges to the field of regenerative dentistry. Interdisciplinary efforts from cellular biologists, material scientists, and clinical odontologists are being made to establish strategies and find the solutions for dental tissue regeneration and/or whole-tooth regeneration. In recent years, many significant discoveries were done regarding signaling pathways and factors shaping calcified tissue genesis, including those of tooth. Novel biocompatible scaffolds and polymer-based drug release systems are under development and may soon result in clinically applicable biomaterials with the potential to modulate signaling cascades involved in dental tissue genesis and regeneration. Approaches for whole-tooth regeneration utilizing adult stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, or tooth germ cells transplantation are emerging as promising alternatives to overcome existing in vitro tissue generation hurdles. In this interdisciplinary review, most recent advances in cellular signaling guiding dental tissue genesis, novel functionalized scaffolds and drug release material, various odontogenic cell sources, and methods for tooth regeneration are discussed thus providing a multi-faceted, up-to-date, and illustrative overview on the tooth regeneration matter, alongside hints for future directions in the challenging field of regenerative dentistry.

Indexed as

OdontogenesisRegenerationAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDental EnamelDrug CarriersHumansSignal TransductionStem CellsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsToothBiocompatible MaterialsDrug Carriersamelogenesiscementogenesisdentinogenesisdentogenesisdrug release materialsodontogenic cellsscaffoldsstem cellswhole-tooth regeneration

Identifiers

PMID32512908
PMCPMC7312198
OpenAlexW3033489555

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.