Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32514005›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Integrative phenotyping of glycemic responders upon clinical weight loss using multi-omics.

Armand Valsesia, Anirikh Chakrabarti, Jörg Hager, Dominique Langin, Wim H M Saris, Arne Astrup, Ellen E Blaak, Nathalie Viguerie, Mojgan Masoodi

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Armand ValsesiaNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland. Armand.Valsesia@gmail.com.
Anirikh ChakrabartiNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jörg HagerNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Dominique LanginINSERM, UMR 1048, Institute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases, Toulouse, France.
Wim H M SarisDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+(MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Arne AstrupUniversity of Copenhagen, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Faculty of Science, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ellen E BlaakDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+(MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nathalie ViguerieINSERM, UMR 1048, Institute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases, Toulouse, France.
Mojgan MasoodiNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland. mojgan.masoodi@insel.ch.
Nestlé (Switzerland) · CHMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLInserm · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weight loss aims to improve glycemic control in obese but strong variability is observed. Using a multi-omics approach, we investigated differences between 174 responders and 201 non-responders, that had lost >8% body weight following a low-caloric diet (LCD, 800 kcal/d for 8 weeks). The two groups were comparable at baseline for body composition, glycemic control, adipose tissue transcriptomics and plasma ketone bodies. But they differed significantly in their response to LCD, including improvements in visceral fat, overall insulin resistance (IR) and tissue-specific IR. Transcriptomics analyses found down-regulation in key lipogenic genes (e.g. SCD, ELOVL5) in responders relative to non-responders; metabolomics showed increase in ketone bodies; while proteomics revealed differences in lipoproteins. Findings were consistent between genders; with women displaying smaller improvements owing to a better baseline metabolic condition. Integrative analyses identified a plasma omics model that was able to predict non-responders with strong performance (on a testing dataset, the Receiving Operating Curve Area Under the Curve (ROC AUC) was 75% with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) [67%, 83%]). This model was based on baseline parameters without the need for intrusive measurements and outperformed clinical models (p = 0.00075, with a +14% difference on the ROC AUCs). Our approach document differences between responders and non-responders, with strong contributions from liver and adipose tissues. Differences may be due to de novo lipogenesis, keto-metabolism and lipoprotein metabolism. These findings are useful for clinical practice to better characterize non-responders both prior and during weight loss.

Indexed as

GenomicsProteomicsAdipose TissueArea Under CurveBody CompositionDiet, ReducingDown-RegulationFatty Acid ElongasesHumansIntra-Abdominal FatKetone BodiesLipidsPhenotypeROC CurveWeight LossELOVL5 protein, humanFatty Acid ElongasesKetone BodiesLipids

Identifiers

PMID32514005
PMCPMC7280519
OpenAlexW3033899763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.