Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32518094›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

The top 10 retinoblastoma research priorities in Canada as determined by patients, clinicians and researchers: a patient-oriented priority-setting partnership.

Kaitlyn Flegg, Maxwell J Gelkopf, Sarah A Johnson, Helen Dimaras, Canadian Retinoblastoma Research Advisory Board Priority Setting Steering Committee

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kaitlyn FleggDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Flegg, Gelkopf, Dimaras), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Neuroscience (Johnson), Evelyn F. and William L. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Dimaras), Faculty of Medicine, and Division of Clinical Public Health (Dimaras), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program (Dimaras) and Centre for Global Child Health (Dimaras), SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ont.
Maxwell J GelkopfDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Flegg, Gelkopf, Dimaras), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Neuroscience (Johnson), Evelyn F. and William L. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Dimaras), Faculty of Medicine, and Division of Clinical Public Health (Dimaras), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program (Dimaras) and Centre for Global Child Health (Dimaras), SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ont.
Sarah A JohnsonDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Flegg, Gelkopf, Dimaras), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Neuroscience (Johnson), Evelyn F. and William L. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Dimaras), Faculty of Medicine, and Division of Clinical Public Health (Dimaras), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program (Dimaras) and Centre for Global Child Health (Dimaras), SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ont.
Helen DimarasDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Flegg, Gelkopf, Dimaras), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Neuroscience (Johnson), Evelyn F. and William L. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences (Dimaras), Faculty of Medicine, and Division of Clinical Public Health (Dimaras), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program (Dimaras) and Centre for Global Child Health (Dimaras), SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ont. helen.dimaras@sickkids.ca.
Canadian Retinoblastoma Research Advisory Board Priority Setting Steering Committee
Neurosciences Institute · US

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetinoblastoma is a childhood cancer of the eye that can have lifelong effects on patients and families. The purpose of this study was for people affected by retinoblastoma, clinicians and researchers to jointly determine the top 10 retinoblastoma research priorities in Canada.

methodsAn adaptation of the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) methodology was employed. People were invited to participate in any stage of the priority-setting process if they were a resident of Canada, and were a patient with retinoblastoma (or a family member or friend of someone diagnosed with retinoblastoma) or a clinician or researcher interested in retinoblastoma. Patients were full partners in study design and implementation, and result dissemination, through involvement in a national working group (1 patient and 9 nonpatients) and steering committee (4 patients and 11 nonpatients). In phase 1 of the study, participants responded to an online survey that asked, "What questions about retinoblastoma would you like to see answered by research?" In phase 2, the steering committee reviewed and refined the list of survey responses and decided on a list of 30 questions to be ranked by means of the nominal group technique in phase 3, a priority-setting workshop.

resultsIn total, 175 retinoblastoma research questions were suggested by 59 survey participants (38 patients and 21 nonpatients). The categories with the greatest number of questions were genetics and molecular (45 [25.7%]), second cancer (29 [16.6%]) and psychosocial (27 [15.4%]). The top 10 questions as ranked by the workshop participants (10 patients and 10 nonpatients) fell into 7 categories: second cancer (2 questions), follow-up (2), psychosocial (2), treatment (1), diagnosis (1), global health (1) and miscellaneous (1). The early diagnosis of retinoblastoma was identified as the top retinoblastoma research priority in Canada.

interpretationThe list of priorities will serve as a resource for advocacy groups, research teams and funding agencies that focus on retinoblastoma. The inclusion of researchers as participants was an adaptation of the James Lind Alliance PSP methodology and enriched the research prioritization process.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDecision MakingHealth PrioritiesCanadaFemaleHumansMalePatient ParticipationPhysiciansProfessional RoleResearch PersonnelRetinoblastoma

Identifiers

PMID32518094
PMCPMC7286623
OpenAlexW3033600118

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.