Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32523481›Full record

ReviewHSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery2020

History of Spinal Fusion: Where We Came from and Where We Are Going.

Sohrab Virk, Sheeraz Qureshi, Harvinder Sandhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Risk factors for pedicle screw loosening: a comprehensive review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Therapeutics for enhancement of spinal fusion: A mini review.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sohrab VirkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9617-1987
Sheeraz QureshiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA.
Harvinder SandhuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal fusion surgery is performed all over the world to help patients with cervical and thoracolumbar pathology. As outcomes continue to improve in patients with spine-related pathology, it is important to understand how we got to modern day spinal fusion surgery. Scientific innovations have ranged from the first spinal fusions performed with basic instrumentation in the late nineteenth century to contemporary tools such as pedicle screws, bone grafts, and interbody devices. This article tracks this technological growth so that surgeons may better serve their patients in treating spine-related pain and disability.

Indexed as

bone grafthistory of spinal surgeryspinal fusionspine technology

Identifiers

PMID32523481
PMCPMC7253552

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.