ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2020
XenoNet: Inference and Likelihood of Intermediate Metabolite Formation.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolite Identification Data in Drug Discovery, Part 2: Site-of-Metabolism Annotation, Analysis, and Exploration for Machine Learning.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Site-of-Metabolism Prediction with Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Automated Annotation of Sites of Metabolism from Biotransformation Data.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Active Learning Approach for Guiding Site-of-Metabolism Measurement and Annotation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- MetaTox 2.0: Estimating the Biological Activity Spectra of Drug-like Compounds Taking into Account Probable Biotransformations.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Message Passing Neural Networks Improve Prediction of Metabolite Authenticity.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in Real-Life Drug Design Cases.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- MetaClass, a Comprehensive Classification System for Predicting the Occurrence of Metabolic Reactions Based on the MetaQSAR Database.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- NICEdrug.ch, a workflow for rational drug design and systems-level analysis of drug metabolism.eLife · 2021Article
- Bioactivation of Isoxazole-Containing Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal Domain (BET) Inhibitors.Metabolites · 2021Article
- Significance of Multiple Bioactivation Pathways for Meclofenamate as Revealed through Modeling and Reaction Kinetics.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2021Article
- Metabolic Forest: Predicting the Diverse Structures of Drug Metabolites.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug metabolism is a common cause of adverse drug reactions. Drug molecules can be metabolized into reactive metabolites, which can conjugate to biomolecules, like protein and DNA, in a process termed bioactivation. To mitigate adverse reactions caused by bioactivation, both experimental and computational screening assays are utilized. Experimental assays for assessing the formation of reactive metabolites are low throughput and expensive to perform, so they are often reserved until later stages of the drug development pipeline when the drug candidate pools are already significantly narrowed. In contrast, computational methods are high throughput and cheap to perform to screen thousands to millions of compounds for potentially toxic molecules during the early stages of the drug development pipeline. Commonly used computational methods focus on detecting and structurally characterizing reactive metabolite-biomolecule adducts or predicting sites on a drug molecule that are liable to form reactive metabolites. However, such methods are often only concerned with the structure of the initial drug molecule or of the adduct formed when a biomolecule conjugates to a reactive metabolite. Thus, these methods are likely to miss intermediate metabolites that may lead to subsequent reactive metabolite formation. To address these shortcomings, we create XenoNet, a metabolic network predictor, that can take a pair of a substrate and a target product as input and (1) enumerate pathways, or sequences of intermediate metabolite structures, between the pair, and (2) compute the likelihood of those pathways and intermediate metabolites. We validate XenoNet on a large, chemically diverse data set of 17 054 metabolic networks built from a literature-derived reaction database. Each metabolic network has a defined substrate molecule that has been experimentally observed to undergo metabolism into a defined product metabolite. XenoNet can predict experimentally observed pathways and intermediate metabolites linking the input substrate and product pair with a recall of 88 and 46%, respectively. Using likelihood scoring, XenoNet also achieves a top-one pathway and intermediate metabolite accuracy of 93.6 and 51.9%, respectively. We further validate XenoNet against prior methods for metabolite prediction. XenoNet significantly outperforms all prior methods across multiple metrics. XenoNet is available at https://swami.wustl.edu/xenonet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.