Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32529581›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2020

Smoking and multiple sclerosis risk: a Mendelian randomization study.

Marijne Vandebergh, An Goris

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Personalized prevention of neurodegenerative diseases: scoping review and evidence gap map.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marijne VandeberghDepartment of Neurosciences, Laboratory for Neuroimmunology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 bus 1022, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9645-2615
An GorisDepartment of Neurosciences, Laboratory for Neuroimmunology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 bus 1022, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. an.goris@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1276-6682
Allen Institute for Brain Science · USVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research · BE

Funding

Research Foundation-Flanders 11ZZZ19NResearch Foundation-Flanders G.07334.15Research Fund KU Leuven C24/16/045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStriking changes in the demographic pattern of multiple sclerosis (MS) strongly indicate an influence of modifiable exposures, which lend themselves well to intervention. It is important to pinpoint which of the many environmental, lifestyle, and sociodemographic changes that have occurred over the past decades, such as higher smoking and obesity rates, are responsible. Mendelian randomization (MR) is an elegant tool to overcome limitations inherent to observational studies and leverage human genetics to inform prevention strategies in MS.

methodsWe use genetic variants from the largest genome-wide association study for smoking phenotypes (initiation: N = 378, heaviness: N = 55, lifetime smoking: N = 126) and body mass index (BMI, N = 656) and apply these as instrumental variables in a two-sample MR analysis to the most recent meta-analysis for MS. We adjust for the genetic correlation between smoking and BMI in a multivariable MR.

resultsIn univariable and multivariable MR, smoking does not have an effect on MS risk nor explains part of the association between BMI and MS risk. In contrast, in both analyses each standard deviation increase in BMI, corresponding to roughly 5 kg/m

conclusionDespite observational studies repeatedly reporting an association between smoking and increased risk for MS, MR analyses on smoking phenotypes and MS risk could not confirm a causal relationship. This is in contrast with BMI, where observational studies and MR agree on a causal contribution. The reasons for the discrepancy between observational studies and our MR study concerning smoking and MS require further investigation.

Indexed as

Mendelian Randomization AnalysisMultiple SclerosisBody Mass IndexGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansSmokingEnvironmentGeneticsMendelian randomizationMultiple sclerosisSusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID32529581
PMCPMC7501136
OpenAlexW3034924552

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.