ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2020
Prime time for primate functional genomics.
Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- From individuals to communities: How genomics is transforming biodiversity conservation.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Taxonomic variation in immune response strategies among primates.Genes and immunity · 2025Review
- Addressing missing context in regulatory variation across primate evolution.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025Review
- Cost-effective solutions for high-throughput enzymatic DNA methylation sequencing.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Generation and characterization of inducible KRAB-dCas9 iPSCs from primates for cross-species CRISPRi.iScience · 2024Article
- The relationship between regulatory changes in cis and trans and the evolution of gene expression in humans and chimpanzees.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Current advances in primate genomics: novel approaches for understanding evolution and disease.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- Regulatory and coding sequences of TRNP1 co-evolve with brain size and cortical folding in mammals.eLife · 2023Article
- Leveraging massively parallel reporter assays for evolutionary questions.Genome biology · 2023Review
- Accounting for cis-regulatory constraint prioritizes genes likely to affect species-specific traits.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Evolutionary insights into primate skeletal gene regulation using a comparative cell culture model.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- An evolutionary perspective of DNA methylation patterns in skeletal tissues using a baboon model of osteoarthritis.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021Article
- Article
- A non-invasive method to generate induced pluripotent stem cells from primate urine.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional genomics research is continually improving our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships in humans, and comparative genomics perspectives can provide additional insight into the evolutionary histories of such relationships. To specifically identify conservation or species-specific divergence in humans, we must look to our closest extant evolutionary relatives. Primate functional genomics research has been steadily advancing and expanding, in spite of several limitations and challenges that this field faces. New technologies and cheaper sequencing provide a unique opportunity to enhance and expand primate comparative studies, and we outline possible paths going forward. The potential human-specific insights that can be gained from primate functional genomics research are substantial, and we propose that now is a prime time to expand such endeavors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.