ArticleBrain sciences2020
Extensive Evaluation of Morphological Statistical Harmonization for Brain Age Prediction.
Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current challenges and future directions for brain age prediction in children and adolescents.Nature communications · 2025Review
- ComBatLS: A Location- and Scale-Preserving Method for Multi-Site Image Harmonization.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Increasing Health Literacy on ADHD: A Cross-Disciplinary Integrative Review Examining the Impact of ADHD on Brain Maturation, Composition and Function and Cognitive Processes Across the Life Course.Child psychiatry and human development · 2025Review
- Multi-cohort, multi-sequence harmonisation for cerebrovascular brain age.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Explainable brain age prediction: a comparative evaluation of morphometric and deep learning pipelines.Brain informatics · 2024Article
- ComBatLS: A location- and scale-preserving method for multi-site image harmonization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Brain-age prediction: Systematic evaluation of site effects, and sample age range and size.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Efficacy of MRI data harmonization in the age of machine learning: a multicenter study across 36 datasets.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of popular predictors for difficult laryngoscopy using hybrid intelligent detection methods.Heliyon · 2022Article
- The impact of harmonization on radiomic features in Parkinson's disease and healthy controls: A multicenter study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Multi-site harmonization of MRI data uncovers machine-learning discrimination capability in barely separable populations: An example from the ABIDE dataset.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Article
- Longitudinal Analysis of Brain-Predicted Age in Amnestic and Non-amnestic Sporadic Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Explainable Deep Learning for Personalized Age Prediction With Brain Morphology.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Association between Structural Connectivity and Generalized Cognitive Spectrum in Alzheimer's Disease.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Brain Age Prediction With Morphological Features Using Deep Neural Networks: Results From Predictive Analytic Competition 2019.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterizing both neurodevelopmental and aging brain structural trajectories is important for understanding normal biological processes and atypical patterns that are related to pathological phenomena. Initiatives to share open access morphological data contributed significantly to the advance in brain structure characterization. Indeed, such initiatives allow large brain morphology multi-site datasets to be shared, which increases the statistical sensitivity of the outcomes. However, using neuroimaging data from multi-site studies requires harmonizing data across the site to avoid bias. In this work we evaluated three different harmonization techniques on the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE) dataset for age prediction analysis in two groups of subjects (i.e., controls and autism spectrum disorder). We extracted the morphological features from T1-weighted images of a mixed cohort of 654 subjects acquired from 17 sites to predict the biological age of the subjects using three machine learning regression models. A machine learning framework was developed to quantify the effects of the different harmonization strategies on the final performance of the models and on the set of morphological features that are relevant to the age prediction problem in both the presence and absence of pathology. The results show that, even if two harmonization strategies exhibit similar accuracy of predictive models, a greater mismatch occurs between the sets of most age-related predictive regions for the Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) subjects. Thus, we propose to use a stability index to extract meaningful features for a robust clinical validation of the outcomes of multiple harmonization strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.