Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32554386›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Ensemble Learning Models Based on Noninvasive Features for Type 2 Diabetes Screening: Model Development and Validation.

Tianzhou Yang, Li Zhang, Liwei Yi, Huawei Feng, Shimeng Li, Haoyu Chen, Junfeng Zhu, Jian Zhao, Yingyue Zeng, Hongsheng Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tianzhou Yang *School of Life Science, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9581-2498
Li Zhang *School of Life Science, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5029-2134
Liwei YiSchool of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6539-5662
Huawei FengSchool of Life Science, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-4590
Shimeng LiSchool of Life Science, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7303-3987
Haoyu ChenSchool of Information, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4614-0661
Junfeng ZhuSchool of Life Science, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5845-0969
Jian ZhaoSchool of Life Science, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-2337
Yingyue ZengSchool of Life Science, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3808-4425
Hongsheng LiuSchool of Life Science, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9242-6508
Liaoning University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diabetes screening can effectively reduce the burden of disease. However, natural population-based screening projects require a large number of resources. With the emergence and development of machine learning, researchers have started to pursue more flexible and efficient methods to screen or predict type 2 diabetes.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to build prediction models based on the ensemble learning method for diabetes screening to further improve the health status of the population in a noninvasive and inexpensive manner.

methodsThe dataset for building and evaluating the diabetes prediction model was extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2011-2016. After data cleaning and feature selection, the dataset was split into a training set (80%, 2011-2014), test set (20%, 2011-2014) and validation set (2015-2016). Three simple machine learning methods (linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, and random forest) and easy ensemble methods were used to build diabetes prediction models. The performance of the models was evaluated through 5-fold cross-validation and external validation. The Delong test (2-sided) was used to test the performance differences between the models.

resultsWe selected 8057 observations and 12 attributes from the database. In the 5-fold cross-validation, the three simple methods yielded highly predictive performance models with areas under the curve (AUCs) over 0.800, wherein the ensemble methods significantly outperformed the simple methods. When we evaluated the models in the test set and validation set, the same trends were observed. The ensemble model of linear discriminant analysis yielded the best performance, with an AUC of 0.849, an accuracy of 0.730, a sensitivity of 0.819, and a specificity of 0.709 in the validation set.

conclusionsThis study indicates that efficient screening using machine learning methods with noninvasive tests can be applied to a large population and achieve the objective of secondary prevention.

Indexed as

machine learningnon-invasive attributesscreeningtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32554386
PMCPMC7333074
OpenAlexW3005508070

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.