ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020
Ensemble Learning Models Based on Noninvasive Features for Type 2 Diabetes Screening: Model Development and Validation.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Lifestyle-Based Fuzzy-Enhanced ANN Model for Early Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes and Personalized Management in the North Indian Population.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bias in machine learning applications to address non-communicable diseases at a population-level: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Meets Meta-Heuristics: Bald Eagle Search Optimization and Red Deer Optimization for Feature Selection in Type II Diabetes Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Application of a novel nested ensemble algorithm in predicting motor function recovery in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Methods for improving colorectal cancer annotation efficiency for artificial intelligence-observer training.World journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Enhancement of Classifier Performance Using Swarm Intelligence in Detection of Diabetes from Pancreatic Microarray Gene Data.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Detection of Diabetes through Microarray Genes with Enhancement of Classifiers Performance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Models to Predict the Risk of Rapidly Progressive Kidney Disease and the Need for Nephrology Referral in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Predicting the Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Elderly Using Machine Learning Techniques.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Machine learning and deep learning predictive models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly diabetes screening can effectively reduce the burden of disease. However, natural population-based screening projects require a large number of resources. With the emergence and development of machine learning, researchers have started to pursue more flexible and efficient methods to screen or predict type 2 diabetes.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to build prediction models based on the ensemble learning method for diabetes screening to further improve the health status of the population in a noninvasive and inexpensive manner.
methodsThe dataset for building and evaluating the diabetes prediction model was extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2011-2016. After data cleaning and feature selection, the dataset was split into a training set (80%, 2011-2014), test set (20%, 2011-2014) and validation set (2015-2016). Three simple machine learning methods (linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, and random forest) and easy ensemble methods were used to build diabetes prediction models. The performance of the models was evaluated through 5-fold cross-validation and external validation. The Delong test (2-sided) was used to test the performance differences between the models.
resultsWe selected 8057 observations and 12 attributes from the database. In the 5-fold cross-validation, the three simple methods yielded highly predictive performance models with areas under the curve (AUCs) over 0.800, wherein the ensemble methods significantly outperformed the simple methods. When we evaluated the models in the test set and validation set, the same trends were observed. The ensemble model of linear discriminant analysis yielded the best performance, with an AUC of 0.849, an accuracy of 0.730, a sensitivity of 0.819, and a specificity of 0.709 in the validation set.
conclusionsThis study indicates that efficient screening using machine learning methods with noninvasive tests can be applied to a large population and achieve the objective of secondary prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.