Evidence mapPaperPMID 32559310Full record

ArticleActa neurologica Scandinavica2020

Medication adherence/persistence among patients with active multiple sclerosis in Finland.

Sanni Lahdenperä, Merja Soilu-Hänninen, Hanna-Maija Kuusisto, Sari Atula, Jouni Junnila, Anders Berglund

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Treatment Adherence in a Large Cohort of Turkish Multiple Sclerosis Population.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Adherence to Therapy in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis-Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sanni LahdenperäBiogen Finland Oy, Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7306-3502
Merja Soilu-HänninenDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6930-0229
Hanna-Maija KuusistoTampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Sari AtulaClinical Neurosciences, Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jouni Junnila4Pharma, Helsinki, Finland.
Anders BerglundBiogen Finland Oy, Espoo, Finland.
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sweden) · SEUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

Biogen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore adherence, persistence, and treatment patterns in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in Finland treated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for active MS in 2005-2018. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study cohort was identified using the Drug Prescription Register of Social Insurance Institute, Finland. All patients had at least one prescription of glatiramer acetate (GA), beta-interferons, teriflunomide, or delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF). Adherence was calculated using proportion of days covered (PDC) (cutoff ≥0.8). Time to non-persistence was calculated by the number of days on index DMT treatment before the first treatment gap (≥90 days) or switch and analyzed with time-to-event methodology.

resultsThe cohort included 7474 MS patients (72.2% female; mean age 38.9 years). Treatment switches were steady over 2005-2012, peaked in 2015. PDC means (standard deviations) were GA, 0.87 (0.17); beta-interferons, 0.88 (0.15); DMF, 0.89 (0.14); teriflunomide, 0.93 (0.10). Adherence frequencies were GA, 78.4%; beta-interferons, 81.3%; DMF, 86.9%; teriflunomide, 91.7%. Logistic regression showed that age group, DMT and the starting year, sex, and hospital district independently affected adherence. Patients receiving teriflunomide and DMF, males, and older patients were more likely to persist on treatment. There was no difference in persistence between patients prescribed teriflunomide and DMF, or between GA and beta-interferons.

conclusionsOral DMTs had greater adherence and persistence than injectable DMTs.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisYoung AdultImmunosuppressive Agentsadherencemedicationmedication non-adherencemedication persistencemultiple sclerosisrelapsing-remitting

Identifiers

PMID32559310
PMCPMC7689851
OpenAlexW3036363204

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.