Evidence mapPaperPMID 32565459Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Nurture Early for Optimal Nutrition (NEON) programme: qualitative study of drivers of infant feeding and care practices in a British-Bangladeshi population.

Monica Lakhanpaul, Lorna Benton, Oliver Lloyd-Houldey, Logan Manikam, Diana Margot Rosenthal, Shereen Allaham, Michelle Heys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monica Lakhanpaul *Population, Policy and Practice, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK m.lakhanpaul@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5288-3325
Lorna Benton *Population, Policy and Practice, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Oliver Lloyd-HouldeyPopulation, Policy and Practice, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Logan ManikamDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, London, UK.
Diana Margot RosenthalPopulation, Policy and Practice, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Shereen AllahamDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, London, UK.
Michelle HeysPopulation, Policy and Practice, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR300020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore optimal infant feeding and care practices and their drivers within the British-Bangladeshi population of East London, UK, as an exemplar to inform development of a tailored, coadapted participatory community intervention.

designQualitative community-based participatory research.

settingCommunity and children's centres and National Health Service settings within Tower Hamlets, London, UK.

participants141 participants completed the community study including: British-Bangladeshi mothers, fathers, grandmothers and grandfathers of infants and young children aged 6-23 months, key informants and lay community members from the British-Bangladeshi population of Tower Hamlets, and health professionals working in Tower Hamlets.

results141 participants from all settings and generations identified several infant feeding and care practices and wider socioecological factors that could be targeted to optimise nutritional outcomes. Our modifiable infant feeding and care practices were highlighted: untimely introduction of semi and solid foods, overfeeding, prolonged parent-led feeding and feeding to 'fill the belly'. Wider socioecological determinants were highlighted, categorised here as: (1) society and culture (e.g. equating 'chubby baby' to healthy baby), (2) physical and local environment (e.g. fast food outlets, advertising) and (3) information and awareness (e.g. communication with healthcare professionals around cultural norms).

conclusionsParenting interventions should be codeveloped with communities and tailored to recognise and take account of social and cultural norms and influence from different generations that inform infant feeding and care practices and may be of particular importance for infants from ethnically diverse communities. In addition, UK infant feeding environment requires better regulation of marketing of foods for infants and young children if it is to optimise nutrition in the early years.

Indexed as

Bottle FeedingCultureHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfant CareInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnxietyBangladeshBreast FeedingCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumansInfantLondonMaleBritish Bangladeshichildrencommunitycomplementary feedingearly interventionsfeeding practiceinfantnutritionparticipatory

Identifiers

PMID32565459
PMCPMC7307527

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.