Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32567331›Full record

ReviewBrain connectivity2020

Dissecting the Fornix in Basic Memory Processes and Neuropsychiatric Disease: A Review.

Susan L Benear, Chi T Ngo, Ingrid R Olson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain connectivity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diencephalic integrity explains aspects of hippocampal amnesia.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susan L BenearDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Chi T NgoCenter for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Ingrid R OlsonDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

The Neural Basis of Social KnowledgeR01MH091113 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLSON, INGRID R · 2010 to 2019
$3.7M
Between Encoding and Retrieval: Behavioral and Neural Indices of Reactivation in Children’s Memory DevelopmentR21HD098509 · NICHD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLSON, INGRID R · 2019 to 2020
$392k
The Neural Basis of Social KnowledgeR56MH091113 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLSON, INGRID R · 2020 to 2020
$375k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD098509NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091113NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH091113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleFornix, BrainMemory DisordersMemory, EpisodicMental DisordersNeural PathwaysAlzheimer's diseasediffusion imagingepisodic memoryfornixhippocampuswhite matter

Identifiers

PMID32567331
PMCPMC7495920

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.