Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32583017›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020

The Dilemma After an Unforeseen Positive Sentinel Node in Primary Breast Cancer: Is Completion Axillary Dissection Necessary?

S van Bekkum, A C Kraima, P J Westenend, P W Plaisier, M B E Menke-Pluijmers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

S van BekkumDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, P.O. Box 444, 3300 AK, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6924-9275
A C KraimaDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, P.O. Box 444, 3300 AK, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
P J WestenendDepartment of Pathology, Laboratory of Pathology, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
P W PlaisierDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, P.O. Box 444, 3300 AK, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
M B E Menke-PluijmersDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, P.O. Box 444, 3300 AK, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. mbe.menke@asz.nl.
Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the majority of cases, the sentinel node is the only positive node in the axilla and completion ALND (cALND) is a futile procedure. However, refraining from cALND will lead to less accurate staging and, possibly, undertreatment. To help resolve this dilemma, we examined the clinical value of cALND in staging and determining adjuvant treatment.

methodsIn a retrospective cohort, all consecutive patients over a five-year period with primary breast cancer who received ALND were identified and grouped based on timing of ALND. Total nodal yield and positive lymph nodes were defined and factors with possible impact identified. In the case of cALND, N-status upstaging and possible impact on adjuvant treatment were studied in detail.

resultsA total of 280 patients were selected of whom 204 underwent primary ALND (pALND) and 76 cALND. pALND resulted in a significantly higher total nodal yield and more positive nodes when compared to cALND (p = 0.003, and p < 0.001, respectively). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) had no effect on total nodal yield (p = 0.413), but resulted in fewer positive nodes (p < 0.001). Due to the results of cALND, only 11 patients (14%) had upstaging of N-status. All these patients were advised more extensive adjuvant radiotherapy.

conclusionIn the majority of patients, cALND does not lead to upstaging. cALND should be performed only after a careful discussion with the patient about the pros and cons of this procedure, and most probably only in the presence of multiple risk factors for axillary disease in the absence of systemic therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAxillaBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID32583017
OpenAlexW3037254604

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.