Trial reportPloS one2020
Safety and feasibility of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in elderly patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory ascites.
Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sarcopenia Predicts Mortality and Hepatic Encephalopathy After TIPS in Older Adults With Cirrhosis and Improves Prognostic Scores.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- TIPS in Older Adults: Reserve-Based Risk Stratification and Practical Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of preoperative triglyceride levels on hepatic encephalopathy development in TIPS patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Expandable Constrained Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: An Individualised Approach for High-Risk Patients?Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- [Position paper for the standardized use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in adults].Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie · 2025Article
- Risk of portal hypertensive complications preventable by TIPS in patients with ascites.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Article
- Gut microbiome alterations and hepatic encephalopathy post-TIPS in liver cirrhosis patients.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Utility of Advanced Age as a Predictor of Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Association Between Older Age and TIPS-Related Hospitalization Following Shunt Placement.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Article
- Recent developments in the management of ascites in cirrhosis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Review
- Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Outcomes in the Elderly Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gastroenterology research · 2022Article
- Aspirin improves transplant-free survival after TIPS implantation in patients with refractory ascites: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.Hepatology international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsThe management of patients with refractory ascites (RA) is challenging, particularly at higher age. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established treatment for RA, but safety data in elderly patients are rare. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of TIPS in elderly patients with RA.
methodsOverall, 160 consecutive cirrhotic patients receiving a TIPS for RA at Hannover Medical School between 2012 and 2018 were considered for this retrospective analysis. Periinterventional complications such as acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) as well as survival were compared between patients <65 and ≥65 years. Propensity score matching was conducted to match elderly TIPS patients and patients treated with paracentesis.
resultsA number of 53 out of the 160 patients were ≥65 years (33%). Periinterventional course in those ≥65 years appeared to be slightly more complicated than in <65 years as reflected by a significantly longer hospital stay (p = 0.030) and more ACLF-episodes (21% vs. 9%; p = 0.044). 28-day mortality was similar between both groups (p = 0.350), whereas survival of the younger patients was significantly higher at 90 days (p = 0.029) and numerically higher at 1 year (p = 0.171). In the multivariate analysis age ≥65 years remained an independent predictor for 90-day mortality (HR: 2.58; p = 0.028), while it was not associated with 28-day and 1-year survival. Importantly, after matching for potential confounders 1-year survival was similar in elderly patients if treated with TIPS or paracentesis (p = 0.419).
conclusionsTIPS placement in elderly patients with RA appears to be slightly more complicated compared to younger individuals, but overall feasible and at least not inferior to paracentesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.