Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32586032›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Biosensors-Recent Advances and Future Challenges in Electrode Materials.

Fernando Otero, Edmond Magner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Applications and prospects of biomaterials in diabetes management.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fernando OteroDepartment of Chemical Sciences and Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland.
Edmond MagnerDepartment of Chemical Sciences and Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2042-556X
University of Limerick · IE

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 760662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical biosensors benefit from the simplicity, sensitivity, and rapid response of electroanalytical devices coupled with the selectivity of biorecognition molecules. The implementation of electrochemical biosensors in a clinical analysis can provide a sensitive and rapid response for the analysis of biomarkers, with the most successful being glucose sensors for diabetes patients. This review summarizes recent work on the use of structured materials such as nanoporous metals, graphene, carbon nanotubes, and ordered mesoporous carbon for biosensing applications. We also describe the use of additive manufacturing (AM) and review recent progress and challenges for the use of AM in biosensing applications.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesElectrodesGraphiteNanotubes, CarbonElectrochemical TechniquesHumansMetalsGraphiteMetalsNanotubes, Carbonadditive manufacturingcarbon nanotubeelectrochemical biosensorsglucose biosensorsgraphenenanoporous goldnanoporous metalsordered mesoporous carbon

Identifiers

PMID32586032
PMCPMC7349852
OpenAlexW3035813742

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.