Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32606829›Full record

ReviewInfection and drug resistance2020

Proteomic Applications in Antimicrobial Resistance and Clinical Microbiology Studies.

Ehsaneh Khodadadi, Elham Zeinalzadeh, Sepehr Taghizadeh, Bahareh Mehramouz, Fadhil S Kamounah, Ehsan Khodadadi, Khudaverdi Ganbarov, Bahman Yousefi, Milad Bastami, Hossein Samadi Kafil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Proteomic landscape of imipenem resistance inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ProkDBP: Toward more precise identification of prokaryotic DNA binding proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Uncovering virulence factors inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. MALDI-TOF Mass Spectroscopy Applications in Clinical Microbiology.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ehsaneh KhodadadiDrug Applied Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Elham ZeinalzadehStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Sepehr TaghizadehDrug Applied Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Bahareh MehramouzHematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9171-5997
Fadhil S KamounahDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK 2100, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9903-9540
Ehsan KhodadadiDepartment of Biology, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
Khudaverdi GanbarovDepartment of Microbiology, Baku State University, Baku, Azerbaijan.ORCID 0000-0002-6847-3598
Bahman YousefiImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4220-1527
Milad BastamiImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-7686-4505
Hossein Samadi KafilDrug Applied Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6026-8795

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequences of the genomes of all-important bacterial pathogens of man, plants, and animals have been completed. Still, it is not enough to achieve complete information of all the mechanisms controlling the biological processes of an organism. Along with all advances in different proteomics technologies, proteomics has completed our knowledge of biological processes all around the world. Proteomics is a valuable technique to explain the complement of proteins in any organism. One of the fields that has been notably benefited from other systems approaches is bacterial pathogenesis. An emerging field is to use proteomics to examine the infectious agents in terms of, among many, the response the host and pathogen to the infection process, which leads to a deeper knowledge of the mechanisms of bacterial virulence. This trend also enables us to identify quantitative measurements for proteins extracted from microorganisms. The present review study is an attempt to summarize a variety of different proteomic techniques and advances. The significant applications in bacterial pathogenesis studies are also covered. Moreover, the areas where proteomics may lead the future studies are introduced.

Indexed as

bacterial pathogenesis studiesdrug resistancepathogenproteomicsvirulence

Identifiers

PMID32606829
PMCPMC7305820

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.