Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32608551›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of experimental pathology2020

Preclinical relevance of probiotics in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.

Anaísa Martins Marques, Mariáurea Matias Sarandy, Rômulo Dias Novaes, Reggiani Vilela Gonçalves, Mariella Bontempo Freitas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of experimental pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preclinical relevance of probiotics in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.International journal of experimental pathology · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anaísa Martins MarquesDepartment of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Mariáurea Matias SarandyDepartment of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1313-7877
Rômulo Dias NovaesDepartment of Structural Biology, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3186-5328
Reggiani Vilela GonçalvesDepartment of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5831-3590
Mariella Bontempo FreitasDepartment of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5132-242X
Universidade Federal de Viçosa · BRUniversidade Federal de Alfenas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is among the most prevalent metabolic diseases in the world and may result in several long-term complications. The crosstalk between gut microbiota and host metabolism is closely related to T2DM. Currently, fragmented data hamper defining the relationship between probiotics and T2DM. This systematic review aimed at investigating the effects of probiotics on T2DM in animal models. We systematically reviewed preclinical evidences using PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases, recovering 24 original articles published until September 27th, 2019. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. We included experimental studies with animal models reporting the effects of probiotics on T2DM. Studies were sorted by characteristics of publications, animal models, performed analyses, probiotic used and interventions. Bias analysis and methodological quality assessments were examined through the SYRCLE's Risk of Bias tool. Probiotics improved T2DM in 96% of the studies. Most studies (96%) used Lactobacillus strains, and all of them led to improved glycaemia. All studies used rodents as models, and male animals were preferred over females. Results suggest that probiotics have a beneficial effect in T2DM animals and could be used as a supporting alternative in the disease treatment. Considering a detailed evaluation of the reporting and methodological quality, the current preclinical evidence is at high risk of bias. We hope that our critical analysis will be useful in mitigating the sources of bias in further studies.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DysbiosisFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsMaleProbioticsBlood Glucoseanimal modeldiabetes mellitusglycaemiamicrobiotanutritionprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID32608551
PMCPMC7370849
OpenAlexW3039556759

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.