Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32610667›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Do Feelings of Defeat and Entrapment Change over Time? An Investigation of the Integrated Motivational-Volitional Model of Suicidal Behaviour Using Ecological Momentary Assessments.

Jana-Sophie Stenzel, Inken Höller, Dajana Rath, Nina Hallensleben, Lena Spangenberg, Heide Glaesmer, Thomas Forkmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jana-Sophie StenzelInstitute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Inken HöllerDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany.
Dajana RathDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany.
Nina HallenslebenDepartment of Medical Psychology, University of Leipzig, 4109 Leipzig, Germany.
Lena SpangenbergDepartment of Medical Psychology, University of Leipzig, 4109 Leipzig, Germany.
Heide GlaesmerDepartment of Medical Psychology, University of Leipzig, 4109 Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas ForkmannDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background. Defeat and entrapment have been highlighted as major risk factors of suicidal ideation and behavior. Nevertheless, little is known about their short-term variability and their longitudinal association in real-time. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether defeat and entrapment change over time and whether defeat predicts entrapment as stated by the integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behavior. (2) Methods. Healthy participants (

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentSuicidal IdeationEmotionsHumansMotivationRisk Factorsdefeatecological momentary assessmententrapmentintegrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behaviorsuicidal ideationsuicide

Identifiers

PMID32610667
PMCPMC7369950
OpenAlexW3038115733

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.