Evidence mapPaperPMID 32613381Full record

ArticleCell biology and toxicology2021

Human hepatic in vitro models reveal distinct anti-NASH potencies of PPAR agonists.

Joost Boeckmans, Alessandra Natale, Matthias Rombaut, Karolien Buyl, Brent Cami, Veerle De Boe, Anja Heymans, Vera Rogiers, Joery De Kock, Tamara Vanhaecke and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell biology and toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Challenges ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Novel intervention for alcohol-associated liver disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joost BoeckmansDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8399-5872
Alessandra NataleDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Matthias RombautDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Karolien BuylDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Brent CamiDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Veerle De BoeDepartment of Urology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Anja HeymansDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Vera RogiersDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Joery De KockDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Tamara Vanhaecke *Department of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Robim M Rodrigues *Department of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. Robim.Marcelino.Rodrigues@vub.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2927-6791
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a highly prevalent, chronic liver disease characterized by hepatic lipid accumulation, inflammation, and concomitant fibrosis. Up to date, no anti-NASH drugs have been approved. In this study, we reproduced key NASH characteristics in vitro by exposing primary human hepatocytes (PHH), human skin stem cell-derived hepatic cells (hSKP-HPC), HepaRG and HepG2 cell lines, as well as LX-2 cells to multiple factors that play a role in the onset of NASH. The obtained in vitro disease models showed intracellular lipid accumulation, secretion of inflammatory chemokines, induced ATP content, apoptosis, and increased pro-fibrotic gene expression. These cell systems were then used to evaluate the anti-NASH properties of eight peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists (bezafibrate, elafibranor, fenofibrate, lanifibranor, pemafibrate, pioglitazone, rosiglitazone, and saroglitazar). PPAR agonists differently attenuated lipid accumulation, inflammatory chemokine secretion, and pro-fibrotic gene expression.Based on the obtained readouts, a scoring system was developed to grade the anti-NASH potencies. The in vitro scoring system, based on a battery of the most performant models, namely PHH, hSKP-HPC, and LX-2 cultures, showed that elafibranor, followed by saroglitazar and pioglitazone, induced the strongest anti-NASH effects. These data corroborate available clinical data and show the relevance of these in vitro models for the preclinical investigation of anti-NASH compounds.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalChemokinesChildChild, PreschoolGene Expression RegulationHep G2 CellsHumansInflammation MediatorsLipogenesisLiverNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseasePeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsSkinTranscription FactorsChemokinesInflammation MediatorsPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsTranscription FactorsElafibranorIn vitroNon-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)PioglitazoneSaroglitazar

Identifiers

PMID32613381
OpenAlexW3040418931

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.