Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32616730›Full record

ReviewNutrition & diabetes2020

Biochemical and nutritional overview of diet-induced metabolic syndrome models in rats: what is the best choice?

Eduardo Rodríguez-Correa, Imelda González-Pérez, Pedro Isauro Clavel-Pérez, Yolanda Contreras-Vargas, Karla Carvajal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition & diabetes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomolecules · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eduardo Rodríguez-CorreaLaboratorio de Nutrición Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.
Imelda González-PérezLaboratorio de Nutrición Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.
Pedro Isauro Clavel-PérezLaboratorio de Nutrición Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-9414
Yolanda Contreras-VargasLaboratorio de Nutrición Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México.
Karla CarvajalLaboratorio de Nutrición Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México, México. karla_ca@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5522-3266
Instituto Nacional de Pediatria · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a condition that includes obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemias among other, abnormalities that favors type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular diseases development. Three main diet-induced metabolic syndrome models in rats exist: High carbohydrate diet (HCHD), high fat diet (HFD), and high carbohydrate-high fat diet (HCHHFD). We analyzed data from at least 35 articles per diet, from different research groups, to determine their effect on the development of the MS, aimed to aid researchers in choosing the model that better suits their research question; and also the best parameter that defines obesity, as there is no consensus to determine this condition in rats. For the HCHD we found a mild effect on body weight gain and fasting blood glucose levels (FBG), but significant increases in triglycerides, fasting insulin, insulin resistance and visceral fat accumulation. HFD had the greater increase in the parameters previously mentioned, followed by HCHHFD, which had a modest effect on FBG levels. Therefore, to study early stages of MS a HCHD is recommended, while HFD and HCHHFD better reproduce more severe stages of MS. We recommend the assessment of visceral fat accumulation as a good estimate for obesity in the rat.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dietary CarbohydratesDiet, High-FatDyslipidemiasHumansInsulinInsulin ResistanceIntra-Abdominal FatMaleMetabolic SyndromeObesityRatsTriglyceridesBlood GlucoseDietary CarbohydratesInsulinTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID32616730
PMCPMC7331639
OpenAlexW3039526840

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.